2023 The Contribution of Intraoperative CT Integrated Directly With Robotic Navigation: Outcomes of the First 100 Consecutive Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgeries

INTRODUCTION: During robot-assisted spine surgery, the robotic navigation system is typically registered by obtaining intraoperative C-arm images which are then merged to a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Recent technological advances permit direct registration with intraoperative CT with the patient already prone in the operative position. This has implications for improved accuracy and patient safety. METHODS: One hundred consecutive robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion surgeries performed with C-arm (Group 1) and intraoperative CT (Group 2) registration were retrospectively identified to serve as the control and experimental groups, respectively. The primary outcome was any complication within six months postoperatively which required additional surgery. Secondary outcomes were operative duration, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the mean number of instrumented levels (5.07±2.73 vs. 4.46±2.99, p=0.133), mean number of screws placed (8.23±4.18 vs. 7.35±5.15 , p=0.186), or mean number of interbody fusions (0.67±0.73 vs. 0.66±0.070, p=0.921). Compared to Group 1, Group 2 had statistically fewer complications (4% vs. 13%, p=0.023), decreased operative duration (268±61 vs. 302±71 minutes, p=0.0005), decreased fluoroscopy time (40±21 vs. 53±28 seconds, p=0.014), decreased estimated blood loss (351±235 vs. 440±366 milliliters, p=0.019), and decreased hospital length of stay (4.0±2.0 vs. 4.8±3.1 days, p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, compared to standard C-arm registration, the use of intraoperative CT integrated directly with the robotic navigation system reduced the number of postoperative complications, and decreased the operative duration, fluoroscopy time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay for patients undergoing robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion surgeries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_2023
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2023 The Contribution of Intraoperative CT Integrated Directly With Robotic Navigation: Outcomes of the First 100 Consecutive Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgeries

Mosope Soda, Paul C. McAfee, Jeffrey Stewart, Paul L. Asdourian et al.
Neurosurgery
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

2023 The Contribution of Intraoperative CT Integrated Directly With Robotic Navigation: Outcomes of the First 100 Consecutive Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgeries

Mosope Soda, Paul C. McAfee, Jeffrey Stewart, Paul L. Asdourian, Mesfin Lemma, Bryan W. Cunningham, Bradley Moatz
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: During robot-assisted spine surgery, the robotic navigation system is typically registered by obtaining intraoperative C-arm images which are then merged to a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Recent technological advances permit direct registration with intraoperative CT with the patient already prone in the operative position. This has implications for improved accuracy and patient safety. METHODS: One hundred consecutive robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion surgeries performed with C-arm (Group 1) and intraoperative CT (Group 2) registration were retrospectively identified to serve as the control and experimental groups, respectively. The primary outcome was any complication within six months postoperatively which required additional surgery. Secondary outcomes were operative duration, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the mean number of instrumented levels (5.07±2.73 vs. 4.46±2.99, p=0.133), mean number of screws placed (8.23±4.18 vs. 7.35±5.15 , p=0.186), or mean number of interbody fusions (0.67±0.73 vs. 0.66±0.070, p=0.921). Compared to Group 1, Group 2 had statistically fewer complications (4% vs. 13%, p=0.023), decreased operative duration (268±61 vs. 302±71 minutes, p=0.0005), decreased fluoroscopy time (40±21 vs. 53±28 seconds, p=0.014), decreased estimated blood loss (351±235 vs. 440±366 milliliters, p=0.019), and decreased hospital length of stay (4.0±2.0 vs. 4.8±3.1 days, p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, compared to standard C-arm registration, the use of intraoperative CT integrated directly with the robotic navigation system reduced the number of postoperative complications, and decreased the operative duration, fluoroscopy time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay for patients undergoing robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion surgeries.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.