2052 Implementing a Quality Improvement Culture in Neurologic Surgery

INTRODUCTION: Quality Improvement (QI) initiatives have improved patient outcomes and streamlined hospital processes, so the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires residents to participate in QI. However, neurosurgeons and residents at our institution reported barriers to commencing QI projects. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team with representatives from all stakeholder groups conducted the project at the Mayo Clinic from Oct 2019-Jan 2024 following Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control QI methodology, Awareness-Desire-Knowledge-Ability-Reinforcement change management framework, and Standards for QI Reporting Excellence guidelines. This initiative did not require institutional review board approval. RESULTS: The team used a charter and a Suppliers-Inputs-Processes-Outputs-Customers+Requirements tool to diagram the baseline process. Electronic databases quantified baseline metrics. An Ishikawa diagram categorized gaps in quality and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis determined that the primary barriers were suboptimal education and mentorship. The team brainstormed solutions during a Kaizen burst and evaluated proposals via an Impact/Effort grid. To improve education, residents attended a day-long QI fundamentals course and passed an examination. The team conducted three Plan-Design-Study-Act cycles to optimize mentorship. The percentage of residents who completed a project increased from 9% to 87%. Twenty-one residents, 11 neurosurgeons, 14 nurses, 9 staff, and 7 APPs participated on projects. Eleven QI projects commenced, nine were completed, eight resulted in practice changes, and two are ongoing. Interventions included a cart to streamline procedures, a reorganization of personnel to increase efficiency, protocols, and electronic medical record tools. Rigorous stakeholder analysis and sequential completion of QI phases was associated with achievement of initial aims and sustained initiatives over time. CONCLUSIONS: Using QI and change management frameworks, a team developed a novel program comprised of education and mentorship for residents to complete QI projects. We recommend that residents receive formal training and coaching from experienced mentors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_2052
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2052 Implementing a Quality Improvement Culture in Neurologic Surgery

Benjamin D. Elder, Michelle J. Clarke, Robert J. Spinner, David J. Daniels et al.
Neurosurgery
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

2052 Implementing a Quality Improvement Culture in Neurologic Surgery

Benjamin D. Elder, Michelle J. Clarke, Robert J. Spinner, David J. Daniels, Mohamad Bydon, Aaron Biedermann, Ian F. Parney, Elizabeth B. Habermann, Bambi Wessel, Lucas P. Carlstrom, Kathryn Millard, Jamie Joseph Van Gompel, J Wu Christine, Maria Peris-Celda
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Quality Improvement (QI) initiatives have improved patient outcomes and streamlined hospital processes, so the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires residents to participate in QI. However, neurosurgeons and residents at our institution reported barriers to commencing QI projects. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team with representatives from all stakeholder groups conducted the project at the Mayo Clinic from Oct 2019-Jan 2024 following Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control QI methodology, Awareness-Desire-Knowledge-Ability-Reinforcement change management framework, and Standards for QI Reporting Excellence guidelines. This initiative did not require institutional review board approval. RESULTS: The team used a charter and a Suppliers-Inputs-Processes-Outputs-Customers+Requirements tool to diagram the baseline process. Electronic databases quantified baseline metrics. An Ishikawa diagram categorized gaps in quality and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis determined that the primary barriers were suboptimal education and mentorship. The team brainstormed solutions during a Kaizen burst and evaluated proposals via an Impact/Effort grid. To improve education, residents attended a day-long QI fundamentals course and passed an examination. The team conducted three Plan-Design-Study-Act cycles to optimize mentorship. The percentage of residents who completed a project increased from 9% to 87%. Twenty-one residents, 11 neurosurgeons, 14 nurses, 9 staff, and 7 APPs participated on projects. Eleven QI projects commenced, nine were completed, eight resulted in practice changes, and two are ongoing. Interventions included a cart to streamline procedures, a reorganization of personnel to increase efficiency, protocols, and electronic medical record tools. Rigorous stakeholder analysis and sequential completion of QI phases was associated with achievement of initial aims and sustained initiatives over time. CONCLUSIONS: Using QI and change management frameworks, a team developed a novel program comprised of education and mentorship for residents to complete QI projects. We recommend that residents receive formal training and coaching from experienced mentors.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.