2059 Comparing the H-index and Relative Citation Ratio as Measures of Academic Productivity in Neurosurgery
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of academic productivity has been a cornerstone of the medical research community. The Hirsch index (h-index) is a popular tool for assessing academic productivity in neurosurgery but is associated with several limitations. The National Institutes of Health has developed a field-normalized, article-level metric, termed the "relative citation ratio" (RCR), that circumvents several of the h-index's shortcomings and attempts to assess research productivity accurately. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted using publicly available data on neurosurgeons employed at 115 ACGME-accredited neurological surgery programs. Demographic and training data were collected using institutional websites. RCR was calculated using the NIH iCite tool; the h-index was calculated using Scopus. Mean RCR (m-RCR) is the average score of the author's articles. Weighted RCR (w-RCR) is the sum of all article scores. RESULTS: The study included 3,409 neurosurgeons, with males comprising 82.9% and attending physicians accounting for 54.3%. Most neurosurgeons (57.1%) started residency after 2010, with 53.8% having 0-10 years of practice. Significant differences were found in h-index, mean-RCR, and w-RCR across gender, position, faculty rank, years in practice, and subspecialty (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Neuro-oncology had the highest mean-RCR and h-index, while spine had the lowest w-RCR. Mean-RCR was less affected by minor variations in career duration compared to h-index and w-RCR. The correlation between each metric and career duration was highest for h-index (r=0.61, p<0.001), followed by w-RCR (r=0.37, p<0.001) and mean-RCR (r=0.11, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While h-index, mean-RCR, and w-RCR exhibited similar trends in assessing academic productivity, mean-RCR demonstrated the weakest correlation with career duration, suggesting that m-RCR may be a superior complementary tool to the h-index for evaluating academic productivity in neurosurgery, potentially mitigating the disadvantages early-career neurosurgeons face.
Authors
- Niels Pacheco‐Barrios (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5586-8251)
- Christian Andrew Bowers
- David Sánchez-Lorente (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3308-4696)
- Manuel Coheña‐Jiménez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5714-6594)
- Praveen Sanmugananthan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-3326)
- Sina Zoghi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-5590)
- Andre Payman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7802-4120)
- Israel C. Christie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1959-4745)
- Carmelo Venero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0775-5292)
- Madona Pakkam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4291-3775)
- Yujin Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3356-2945)
- Shubhang Bhalla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9343-1373)
- Belda Gulsuyu
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2025-03-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_2059
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00