1030 How Do the True Intraoperative Costs of Endoscopic Discectomy Compare to Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniations? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic lumbar discectomy (ED) is a minimally invasive option for addressing lumbar disc herniations. With the introduction of value-based care systems, assessing the true cost of certain procedures is critical when creating reimbursement models and comparing procedures. METHODS: Total cost for the intraoperative episode was calculated using TDABC methodology. Individual costs were obtained by direct observation, electronic medical records, and through querying multiple departments (business operations, sterile processing, plant operations, and pharmacy). Timestamps for all involved personnel and material resources were documented. A retrospective analysis was performed on 202 patients who underwent lumbar discectomy through either MD (n=167) or ED (n=35) from 2018-2022. Personnel cost was calculated by multiplying the cost-per unit time for each personnel type by the length of time spent in the operating room. Supply cost was calculated by aggregating the cost of all individual supplies, from medications to consumables to surgical trays, utilized during the case. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed comparing the costs between these procedures. RESULTS: The average intraoperative cost per case for ED and MD was $3915 +/- $1025 and $3162 +/- $954, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that ED had higher total cost (β-coefficient: $912 +/- $281, p=<0.01) and supply cost (β-coefficient: $474 +/- $155, p=<0.01) than MD. When accounting for surgeon as a covariate, however, total cost (p=0.478) and supply cost (p=0.468) differences between ED and MD were negligible. CONCLUSIONS: ED has shown to be a better value option in addressing lumbar disc herniations, mostly due to advantages in perioperative care. Here, we show that when correcting for surgeon-level effects, the cost between the two procedures is statistically insignificant, reaffirming the value provided by ED.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1030
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1030 How Do the True Intraoperative Costs of Endoscopic Discectomy Compare to Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniations? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis

Ashmal Sami, Adam Leibold, Jack Jallo, Daniyal Mansoor Ali et al.
Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

1030 How Do the True Intraoperative Costs of Endoscopic Discectomy Compare to Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniations? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis

Ashmal Sami, Adam Leibold, Jack Jallo, Daniyal Mansoor Ali, Sara Thalheimer, Eric Tecce, Joshua Heller, James S. Harrop, Srinivas Prasad, Ashwini Sharan, Advith Sarikonda, Ahilan Sivaganesa
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic lumbar discectomy (ED) is a minimally invasive option for addressing lumbar disc herniations. With the introduction of value-based care systems, assessing the true cost of certain procedures is critical when creating reimbursement models and comparing procedures. METHODS: Total cost for the intraoperative episode was calculated using TDABC methodology. Individual costs were obtained by direct observation, electronic medical records, and through querying multiple departments (business operations, sterile processing, plant operations, and pharmacy). Timestamps for all involved personnel and material resources were documented. A retrospective analysis was performed on 202 patients who underwent lumbar discectomy through either MD (n=167) or ED (n=35) from 2018-2022. Personnel cost was calculated by multiplying the cost-per unit time for each personnel type by the length of time spent in the operating room. Supply cost was calculated by aggregating the cost of all individual supplies, from medications to consumables to surgical trays, utilized during the case. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed comparing the costs between these procedures. RESULTS: The average intraoperative cost per case for ED and MD was $3915 +/- $1025 and $3162 +/- $954, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that ED had higher total cost (β-coefficient: $912 +/- $281, p=<0.01) and supply cost (β-coefficient: $474 +/- $155, p=<0.01) than MD. When accounting for surgeon as a covariate, however, total cost (p=0.478) and supply cost (p=0.468) differences between ED and MD were negligible. CONCLUSIONS: ED has shown to be a better value option in addressing lumbar disc herniations, mostly due to advantages in perioperative care. Here, we show that when correcting for surgeon-level effects, the cost between the two procedures is statistically insignificant, reaffirming the value provided by ED.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.