411 Traumatic Versus Non-Traumatic Injury in Prognosis of Outcomes After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

INTRODUCTION: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) results in devastating paralysis. Spinal column injury (i.e., traumatic SCI) may result in worse outcomes as compared to non-traumatic SCI. However, there remains a lack robust data determining the role of traumatic etiology in prognosticating outcomes after cervical SCI. METHODS: From prospective cohort of SCI model systems, we included adult patients >15 years with traumatic SCI, neurological-level C1-C8, ASIA impairment-scale (AIS) A-D, presented within 30-days of SCI. Traumatic SCI was defined as SCI resulting from spinal column injury and non-traumatic SCI was defined as SCI without any spinal column injury. The primary outcome was composite independence in eating, bladder-management, and transfers domains of functional independence measure at 1-year. Each domain ranges from 1-7; lower score indicating greater functional dependence. Composite independence was defined as score of >=6 in at least 2 domains. RESULTS: Between 1992-2016, 853 patients with cervical SCI and complete neurological/functional measures were included. At baseline, 86% (737) had traumatic SCI and 14% (116) had non-traumatic SCI. Patients with traumatic SCI had significantly larger rates of motor-complete SCI (AIS A-B); 71% versus 31% in non-traumatic SCI (p<0.001). At one-year follow-up, non-traumatic SCI had significantly larger recovery rates in FIM functions compared to traumatic SCI; 53% of non-traumatic cervical SCI patients gained composite independence in FIM functions vs. 39% in traumatic cervical SCI (p=0.007). In multivariable regression, after accounting for age, sex, symmetry-of-SCI, and SCI severity by AIS grade, traumatic SCI was not a significant predictor of functional outcome (p=0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with traumatic SCI present with worse injury severity as compared to non-traumatic SCI. However, both traumatic and non-traumatic cervical SCI have a similar recovery potential. Optimization of clinical pathways is needed to provide appropriate rehabilitation care for patients with cervical SCI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_411
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

411 Traumatic Versus Non-Traumatic Injury in Prognosis of Outcomes After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Jacob K. Greenberg, Braeden Benedict, Saad Javeed, Wilson Zachary Ray et al.
Neurosurgery
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

411 Traumatic Versus Non-Traumatic Injury in Prognosis of Outcomes After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Jacob K. Greenberg, Braeden Benedict, Saad Javeed, Wilson Zachary Ray, Justin K. Zhang, Salim Yakdan, M. Kaleem
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) results in devastating paralysis. Spinal column injury (i.e., traumatic SCI) may result in worse outcomes as compared to non-traumatic SCI. However, there remains a lack robust data determining the role of traumatic etiology in prognosticating outcomes after cervical SCI. METHODS: From prospective cohort of SCI model systems, we included adult patients >15 years with traumatic SCI, neurological-level C1-C8, ASIA impairment-scale (AIS) A-D, presented within 30-days of SCI. Traumatic SCI was defined as SCI resulting from spinal column injury and non-traumatic SCI was defined as SCI without any spinal column injury. The primary outcome was composite independence in eating, bladder-management, and transfers domains of functional independence measure at 1-year. Each domain ranges from 1-7; lower score indicating greater functional dependence. Composite independence was defined as score of >=6 in at least 2 domains. RESULTS: Between 1992-2016, 853 patients with cervical SCI and complete neurological/functional measures were included. At baseline, 86% (737) had traumatic SCI and 14% (116) had non-traumatic SCI. Patients with traumatic SCI had significantly larger rates of motor-complete SCI (AIS A-B); 71% versus 31% in non-traumatic SCI (p<0.001). At one-year follow-up, non-traumatic SCI had significantly larger recovery rates in FIM functions compared to traumatic SCI; 53% of non-traumatic cervical SCI patients gained composite independence in FIM functions vs. 39% in traumatic cervical SCI (p=0.007). In multivariable regression, after accounting for age, sex, symmetry-of-SCI, and SCI severity by AIS grade, traumatic SCI was not a significant predictor of functional outcome (p=0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with traumatic SCI present with worse injury severity as compared to non-traumatic SCI. However, both traumatic and non-traumatic cervical SCI have a similar recovery potential. Optimization of clinical pathways is needed to provide appropriate rehabilitation care for patients with cervical SCI.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.