443 The Shadowy Boundary Between Life and Death: How Physicians Manage Non-Survivable Head Trauma

INTRODUCTION: Caring for patients with a terminal prognosis after a non-survivable head injury is fraught with ethical and moral challenges. METHODS: A web-based, 25-question survey was distributed to fifty academic hospitals. Conventional descriptive statistics and inferential analyses were employed. RESULTS: 133 physicians completed the survey (29% neurosurgery, 25% trauma surgery, 45% critical care). Medical literacy (25%), patient religious/moral views (23%) and trust (17%) were identified as the most significant communication barriers. When broadly asked what outside forces influenced what interventions were offered, physicians cited organ procurement organizations (OPO; 12%) and medical malpractice concerns (10%). Critical care physicians (73.3%) and trauma surgeons (73.5%) were more likely to provide further life-prolonging care to patients with an unknown organ donor status than neurosurgeons (48.7%, p value = 0.023). However, no significant difference was observed between specialties when considering non-organ donors (neurosurgery = 61.5%, critical care = 50%, trauma surgery = 58.5%, p value = 0.481). Physicians reported that disclosing non-survivability to families (43%) and providing futile care (61%) were detrimental to their own mental health. However, 60% percent of respondents felt fulfilled by caring for patients and families after this type of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings show variation in how physicians manage patients after non-survivable head trauma. Clear guidelines delineating reasonable and futile interventions would allow for standardization of care and opportunity for organ donation where appropriate. Additionally, this study revealed a potential impact of non-medical influences such as organ-procurement organizations and medicolegal fears when determining interventions offered. While this study shows that the burden of communicating with families and providing futile medical care takes a toll on mental health to providers, many clinicians continue to derive meaning from their role in the care of these patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_443
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

443 The Shadowy Boundary Between Life and Death: How Physicians Manage Non-Survivable Head Trauma

Connor A. Wathen, Niels D. Martin, Therese M. Murphy, Sonia Ajmera et al.
Neurosurgery
Disaster Response and Management
article

443 The Shadowy Boundary Between Life and Death: How Physicians Manage Non-Survivable Head Trauma

Connor A. Wathen, Niels D. Martin, Therese M. Murphy, Sonia Ajmera, Adam J. Kundishora, Alex P. Vaz, Sanjana R. Salwi, Pious D. Patel, James M. Schuster, Kamila M. Bond, Mackenzie Castellanos, Dmitriy Petrov, Monisha A. Kumar
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Caring for patients with a terminal prognosis after a non-survivable head injury is fraught with ethical and moral challenges. METHODS: A web-based, 25-question survey was distributed to fifty academic hospitals. Conventional descriptive statistics and inferential analyses were employed. RESULTS: 133 physicians completed the survey (29% neurosurgery, 25% trauma surgery, 45% critical care). Medical literacy (25%), patient religious/moral views (23%) and trust (17%) were identified as the most significant communication barriers. When broadly asked what outside forces influenced what interventions were offered, physicians cited organ procurement organizations (OPO; 12%) and medical malpractice concerns (10%). Critical care physicians (73.3%) and trauma surgeons (73.5%) were more likely to provide further life-prolonging care to patients with an unknown organ donor status than neurosurgeons (48.7%, p value = 0.023). However, no significant difference was observed between specialties when considering non-organ donors (neurosurgery = 61.5%, critical care = 50%, trauma surgery = 58.5%, p value = 0.481). Physicians reported that disclosing non-survivability to families (43%) and providing futile care (61%) were detrimental to their own mental health. However, 60% percent of respondents felt fulfilled by caring for patients and families after this type of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings show variation in how physicians manage patients after non-survivable head trauma. Clear guidelines delineating reasonable and futile interventions would allow for standardization of care and opportunity for organ donation where appropriate. Additionally, this study revealed a potential impact of non-medical influences such as organ-procurement organizations and medicolegal fears when determining interventions offered. While this study shows that the burden of communicating with families and providing futile medical care takes a toll on mental health to providers, many clinicians continue to derive meaning from their role in the care of these patients.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.