Amendments for the edition of Tangut <i>Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra</i> published in <i>Heishuicheng Manuscripts Collected in Russia</i>

Volumes from 15 to 20 of Heishuicheng Manuscripts Collected in Russia selectively represent the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra in Tangut language held by the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The fundamental edition of the Collection certainly is not free from some invalidities, which became evident with the time. For the Tangut version of Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra, (1) some folios of different volumes were mistakenly spliced together; (2) the order of the folios of the same volumes were mixed up. The problem of identifying of the text was also aggravated by omissions made by the Tangut people, who copied the text of Sūtra. This paper suggests some new readings and identifications in the Tangut version of Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Written Monuments of the Orient
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55512/wmo642582
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amendments for the edition of Tangut Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra published in Heishuicheng Manuscripts Collected in Russia

Peng Xu
Written Monuments of the Orient
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Amendments for the edition of Tangut Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra published in Heishuicheng Manuscripts Collected in Russia

Peng Xu
article en

Abstract

Volumes from 15 to 20 of Heishuicheng Manuscripts Collected in Russia selectively represent the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra in Tangut language held by the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The fundamental edition of the Collection certainly is not free from some invalidities, which became evident with the time. For the Tangut version of Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra, (1) some folios of different volumes were mistakenly spliced together; (2) the order of the folios of the same volumes were mixed up. The problem of identifying of the text was also aggravated by omissions made by the Tangut people, who copied the text of Sūtra. This paper suggests some new readings and identifications in the Tangut version of Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra.

Written Monuments of the OrientVol. 10(2)
Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
National Ethnic Affairs Commission of the People's Republic of China, Russian Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.