2024 Award for Best Article in NAMES

At the start of each calendar year, the members of the NAMES Editorial Board review the articles that appeared in the previous volume to determine the winners of the Best Article of the Year. After careful reading of each article, the publications are judged across the following three criteria: (1) creativity and originality; (2) potential scholarly contribution to onomastics; and (3) writing style and organization. Per secret ballot, the reviewers independently select the three publications which they have assigned the highest ratings for each of these criteria. The ballots are collected and tallied by the NAMES Editor-in-Chief. In years past, the outcome of the election has been so close that it was necessary to have several rounds of voting to finally determine the top three papers. This year, however, the tallies yielded three clear winners. Although the onomastic subject area for each of the top papers was radically different, all three had one common feature which segregated them from the rest of the year’s submissions. Each demonstrated a remarkably innovative methodological approach which the Board members determined had the potential of making a significant and lasting contribution to future onomastic research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Names
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2025.2755
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2024 Award for Best Article in NAMES

I. M. Nick
2 links
Names
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

2024 Award for Best Article in NAMES

I. M. Nick
article en

Abstract

At the start of each calendar year, the members of the NAMES Editorial Board review the articles that appeared in the previous volume to determine the winners of the Best Article of the Year. After careful reading of each article, the publications are judged across the following three criteria: (1) creativity and originality; (2) potential scholarly contribution to onomastics; and (3) writing style and organization. Per secret ballot, the reviewers independently select the three publications which they have assigned the highest ratings for each of these criteria. The ballots are collected and tallied by the NAMES Editor-in-Chief. In years past, the outcome of the election has been so close that it was necessary to have several rounds of voting to finally determine the top three papers. This year, however, the tallies yielded three clear winners. Although the onomastic subject area for each of the top papers was radically different, all three had one common feature which segregated them from the rest of the year’s submissions. Each demonstrated a remarkably innovative methodological approach which the Board members determined had the potential of making a significant and lasting contribution to future onomastic research.

NamesVol. 73(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.