MEMFD: A Multi-EDT Multi-Fault Scan Chain Diagnosis Methodology with Deep Learning

Manufacturing defects need to be detected and diagnosed with the help of on-chip test infrastructure. Scan chains are the most important part of the test infrastructure in the modern designs. However, these scan chains also turn out to be crucial defect locations requiring a diagnosis procedure that has severe implications on debug time and root-cause discovery. These problems are further exacerbated by the compression mechanism present in the test infrastructure. Diagnosis methods proposed in the literature mainly suggest techniques based on fault type-based dictionary computation, simulation with input diagnostic patterns and the subsequent analysis of error responses against the inputs. However, these methods do not take into account the advanced test compression infrastructure. In this work, we propose a diagnosis methodology that is based on state-of-the-art multi-embedded deterministic test (EDT) architecture. We utilize deep learning-based analysis methodology for the purpose of identification of the faulty EDT section based on the observed output responses. Experimental results indicate that with lesser overhead in debug time and resources, the proposed methodology can diagnose faulty EDT with a success rate of 85-90%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ats64447.2024.10915334
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MEMFD: A Multi-EDT Multi-Fault Scan Chain Diagnosis Methodology with Deep Learning

Utsav Jana, S. A. Siddiqui, U Patel, Bınod Kumar
1 citations
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
0.21
article

MEMFD: A Multi-EDT Multi-Fault Scan Chain Diagnosis Methodology with Deep Learning

Utsav Jana, S. A. Siddiqui, U Patel, Bınod Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Manufacturing defects need to be detected and diagnosed with the help of on-chip test infrastructure. Scan chains are the most important part of the test infrastructure in the modern designs. However, these scan chains also turn out to be crucial defect locations requiring a diagnosis procedure that has severe implications on debug time and root-cause discovery. These problems are further exacerbated by the compression mechanism present in the test infrastructure. Diagnosis methods proposed in the literature mainly suggest techniques based on fault type-based dictionary computation, simulation with input diagnostic patterns and the subsequent analysis of error responses against the inputs. However, these methods do not take into account the advanced test compression infrastructure. In this work, we propose a diagnosis methodology that is based on state-of-the-art multi-embedded deterministic test (EDT) architecture. We utilize deep learning-based analysis methodology for the purpose of identification of the faulty EDT section based on the observed output responses. Experimental results indicate that with lesser overhead in debug time and resources, the proposed methodology can diagnose faulty EDT with a success rate of 85-90%.

Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG), Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MEMFD: A Multi-EDT Multi-Fault Scan Chain Diagnosis Methodology with Deep Learning — Utsav Jana, S. A. Siddiqui, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS