Data-driven equation discovery of a sea ice albedo parametrisation

Abstract. In many sea ice models, a single-category, zero layer thermodynamic scheme is employed, in which sea ice albedo is prescribed based on surface types depending on snow cover, surface temperature, or sea ice thickness. The Parkinson and Washington parametrisation (PW79) is a commonly used one, which assigns four constant albedo values corresponding to distinct surface types. This parametrisation is too simple to capture the spatiotemporal variability of observed sea ice albedo. Here, we aim for an improved parametrisation by discovering an interpretable, physically consistent equation for sea ice albedo using symbolic regression, an interpretable machine learning technique, combined with physical constraints. Leveraging daily pan-Arctic satellite and reanalyses data from 2013–2020 – dominated by conditions representative of the Central Arctic – we apply sequential feature selection which identifies snow depth, surface temperature, sea ice thickness and 2 m air temperature as the most informative features for sea ice albedo. As a function of these features, our data-driven equation identifies two critical mechanisms for determining sea ice albedo: the high sensitivity of sea ice albedo to small changes in thin snow and a weighted difference of the sea ice surface and 2 m air temperature, serving as a seasonal proxy that indicates the transition between melting and freezing conditions. To understand how additional model complexity reduces errors, we evaluate our discovered equation against baseline models with different complexities, such as multilayer perceptron neural networks (NNs) and polynomials on an error-complexity plane, showing that the equation excels in balancing error and complexity and reduces the mean squared error by about 51 % compared to PW79. Unlike NNs, our discovered equation allows for further regional and seasonal analyses due to its inherent interpretability. When fine-tuning its coefficients offline on regional or seasonal subsets, we uncover differences in physical conditions that drive sea ice albedo. As a use case, we further assess the Barents Sea as a contrasting sea ice regime compared to the Central Arctic, showing that the functional form of the equation remains transferable across different sea ice regimes. This study demonstrates that learning an equation from observational data can deepen the process-level understanding of the Arctic Ocean’s surface radiative budget and improve climate projections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4437-2026
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-driven equation discovery of a sea ice albedo parametrisation

Arthur Grundner, Dmitry Sidorenko, Veronika Eyring, Marika M. Holland et al.
˜The œcryosphere
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Data-driven equation discovery of a sea ice albedo parametrisation

Arthur Grundner, Dmitry Sidorenko, Veronika Eyring, Marika M. Holland, Katja Weigel, Diajeng W. Atmojo
article en

Abstract

Abstract. In many sea ice models, a single-category, zero layer thermodynamic scheme is employed, in which sea ice albedo is prescribed based on surface types depending on snow cover, surface temperature, or sea ice thickness. The Parkinson and Washington parametrisation (PW79) is a commonly used one, which assigns four constant albedo values corresponding to distinct surface types. This parametrisation is too simple to capture the spatiotemporal variability of observed sea ice albedo. Here, we aim for an improved parametrisation by discovering an interpretable, physically consistent equation for sea ice albedo using symbolic regression, an interpretable machine learning technique, combined with physical constraints. Leveraging daily pan-Arctic satellite and reanalyses data from 2013–2020 – dominated by conditions representative of the Central Arctic – we apply sequential feature selection which identifies snow depth, surface temperature, sea ice thickness and 2 m air temperature as the most informative features for sea ice albedo. As a function of these features, our data-driven equation identifies two critical mechanisms for determining sea ice albedo: the high sensitivity of sea ice albedo to small changes in thin snow and a weighted difference of the sea ice surface and 2 m air temperature, serving as a seasonal proxy that indicates the transition between melting and freezing conditions. To understand how additional model complexity reduces errors, we evaluate our discovered equation against baseline models with different complexities, such as multilayer perceptron neural networks (NNs) and polynomials on an error-complexity plane, showing that the equation excels in balancing error and complexity and reduces the mean squared error by about 51 % compared to PW79. Unlike NNs, our discovered equation allows for further regional and seasonal analyses due to its inherent interpretability. When fine-tuning its coefficients offline on regional or seasonal subsets, we uncover differences in physical conditions that drive sea ice albedo. As a use case, we further assess the Barents Sea as a contrasting sea ice regime compared to the Central Arctic, showing that the functional form of the equation remains transferable across different sea ice regimes. This study demonstrates that learning an equation from observational data can deepen the process-level understanding of the Arctic Ocean’s surface radiative budget and improve climate projections.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 20(8)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), University of Bremen (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Horizon 2020, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council, German Academic Exchange Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.