Reconceptualizing momentary engagement through the lens of conceptual change learning

This commentary reviews the five papers featured in this special issue, which foster a cross-disciplinary discussion on momentary engagement (ME). The papers represent diverse theoretical perspectives and address key research questions central to understanding students’ ME. The commentary approaches each paper through the lens of conceptual change, focusing on the learning processes needed when the information to be acquired is inconsistent with the existing theoretical frameworks. Methodological challenges in measuring ME within the context of conceptual change are explored, moving beyond traditional acquisition type of learning. The variation in quality and depth of momentary engagement is also discussed, distinguishing between different modes of active learning and engagement. Further attention is given to the complex, dual role of factors such as learner characteristics, prior knowledge, and epistemic beliefs in shaping ME, especially in domains requiring radical reorganization of initial beliefs. Finally, the potential for constructing an integrated model of ME is discussed, in alignment with the holistic approach to ME implied by the papers in this issue. The author emphasizes the importance of studying ME’s interconnected components within both the individual and the context, employing varied methodologies and accounting for different learning types. The implications of integrating different theoretical frameworks are discussed in relation to developing interventions aimed at enhancing students’ ME in the classroom context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontline Learning Research
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v13i2.1587
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconceptualizing momentary engagement through the lens of conceptual change learning

Natassa Kyriakopoulou
Frontline Learning Research
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Reconceptualizing momentary engagement through the lens of conceptual change learning

Natassa Kyriakopoulou
article en

Abstract

This commentary reviews the five papers featured in this special issue, which foster a cross-disciplinary discussion on momentary engagement (ME). The papers represent diverse theoretical perspectives and address key research questions central to understanding students’ ME. The commentary approaches each paper through the lens of conceptual change, focusing on the learning processes needed when the information to be acquired is inconsistent with the existing theoretical frameworks. Methodological challenges in measuring ME within the context of conceptual change are explored, moving beyond traditional acquisition type of learning. The variation in quality and depth of momentary engagement is also discussed, distinguishing between different modes of active learning and engagement. Further attention is given to the complex, dual role of factors such as learner characteristics, prior knowledge, and epistemic beliefs in shaping ME, especially in domains requiring radical reorganization of initial beliefs. Finally, the potential for constructing an integrated model of ME is discussed, in alignment with the holistic approach to ME implied by the papers in this issue. The author emphasizes the importance of studying ME’s interconnected components within both the individual and the context, employing varied methodologies and accounting for different learning types. The implications of integrating different theoretical frameworks are discussed in relation to developing interventions aimed at enhancing students’ ME in the classroom context.

Frontline Learning ResearchVol. 13(2)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.