Doctors’ preferences in the choice of antibacterial drugs in pregnant women (PIKAP study)

BackgroundThe use of rational and safe antibiotic therapies for pregnant women remains an important issue within the medical community.ObjectiveTo analyze the preferences in the choice of antimicrobial drugs (AMD) among obstetricians-gynecologists of Central Russia in treatment of infectious diseases in pregnancy.MethodsThis is anonymous survey of obstetrician and gynecology specialists conducted in Central Russia between September 1st, and November 30th, 2017. Study included five healthcare facilities (ambulatory and in-patient), located in regional center, city Belgorod. Questionnaire contained six open-ended questions to evaluate AMD preferences in treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis or genitalium, Ureaplasma species, acute cystitis, pyelonephritis, and other conditions, such as placental insufficiency, fetal growth restriction. Descriptive statistics was used including absolute and relative frequencies, minimum and maximum values, mean, frequency of prescribing AMD, and their proportion in the total number prescribed.ResultsA total of 52 responses were included in final analysis. There was significant rate of 15.4% of prescribing pregnancy unsafe (fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines) or non-rational AMD or deviation from existing clinical protocols and guidelines.ConclusionsThere were large variations in provider's AMD preference between healthcare facilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251327814
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Doctors’ preferences in the choice of antibacterial drugs in pregnant women (PIKAP study)

Oxana Zarudskaya, Anna Adonina, Р. А. Бонцевич
3 citations
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
Urinary Tract Infections Management
4.06
article

Doctors’ preferences in the choice of antibacterial drugs in pregnant women (PIKAP study)

Oxana Zarudskaya, Anna Adonina, Р. А. Бонцевич
article en
3 citations

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of rational and safe antibiotic therapies for pregnant women remains an important issue within the medical community.ObjectiveTo analyze the preferences in the choice of antimicrobial drugs (AMD) among obstetricians-gynecologists of Central Russia in treatment of infectious diseases in pregnancy.MethodsThis is anonymous survey of obstetrician and gynecology specialists conducted in Central Russia between September 1st, and November 30th, 2017. Study included five healthcare facilities (ambulatory and in-patient), located in regional center, city Belgorod. Questionnaire contained six open-ended questions to evaluate AMD preferences in treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis or genitalium, Ureaplasma species, acute cystitis, pyelonephritis, and other conditions, such as placental insufficiency, fetal growth restriction. Descriptive statistics was used including absolute and relative frequencies, minimum and maximum values, mean, frequency of prescribing AMD, and their proportion in the total number prescribed.ResultsA total of 52 responses were included in final analysis. There was significant rate of 15.4% of prescribing pregnancy unsafe (fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines) or non-rational AMD or deviation from existing clinical protocols and guidelines.ConclusionsThere were large variations in provider's AMD preference between healthcare facilities.

International Journal of Risk & Safety in MedicineVol. 36(3)
Belgorod National Research University (RU), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Mari State University (RU), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Kazan State Medical Academy (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
4.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.