Optimizing <i>in vivo</i> data acquisition for robust clinical microvascular imaging using ultrasound localization microscopy

<i>Objective</i>. Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) enables microvascular imaging at spatial resolutions beyond the acoustic diffraction limit, offering significant clinical potentials. However, ULM performance relies heavily on microbubble (MB) signal sparsity, the number of detected MBs, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), all of which vary in clinical scenarios involving bolus MB injections. These sources of variations underscore the need to optimize MB dosage, data acquisition timing, and imaging settings in order to standardize and optimize ULM of microvasculature. This pilot study aims to investigate the temporal changes in MB signals during bolus injections in both pig and human models to optimize data acquisition for clinical ULM.<i>Approach.</i>Quantitative indices, mainly including individual MB SNR, normalized cross-correlation (NCC) of the MB signal with the point-spread function, and the number of localizable MBs, were developed to evaluate MB signal quality and guide the selection of acquisition timing. The effects of transmitted voltage and dosage on signal quality for MB localization were also explored.<i>Main results</i>. In both pig and human studies, MB localization quality (primarily indicated by NCC) reached a minimum at peak MB concentration, then improved as MB counts decreased during the wash-out phase. An optimal acquisition window was identified by balancing localization quality (empirically, NCC > 0.57) and MB concentration. In the pig model, a relatively short time window (approximately 10 s) for optimal acquisition was identified during the rapid wash-out phase, highlighting the need for real-time MB signal monitoring during data acquisition. The slower wash-out phase in humans allowed for a more flexible imaging window of 1-2 min, while trade-offs were observed between localization quality and MB density (or acquisition length) at different wash-out phase timings. Guided by these findings, robust ULM imaging was achieved in both pig and human kidneys using a short period of data acquisition (3.6 s and 9.6 s of data), demonstrating its feasibility in clinical practice.<i>Significance.</i>This study provides insights into optimizing data acquisition for consistent and reproducible ULM, paving the way for its standardization and broader clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc0de
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing in vivo data acquisition for robust clinical microvascular imaging using ultrasound localization microscopy

Amy Stern, U‐Wai Lok, James D. Krier, Lilach O. Lerman et al.
8 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
5.39
article

Optimizing in vivo data acquisition for robust clinical microvascular imaging using ultrasound localization microscopy

Amy Stern, U‐Wai Lok, James D. Krier, Lilach O. Lerman, Kendra E. Petersen, Andrew D. Rule, Chengwu Huang, Gina K. Hesley, Andrew Bentall, Thomas D. Atwell, Shigao Chen, Kate M Knoll, Jingke Zhang, Kathryn A. Robinson, Xiang Zhu
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) enables microvascular imaging at spatial resolutions beyond the acoustic diffraction limit, offering significant clinical potentials. However, ULM performance relies heavily on microbubble (MB) signal sparsity, the number of detected MBs, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), all of which vary in clinical scenarios involving bolus MB injections. These sources of variations underscore the need to optimize MB dosage, data acquisition timing, and imaging settings in order to standardize and optimize ULM of microvasculature. This pilot study aims to investigate the temporal changes in MB signals during bolus injections in both pig and human models to optimize data acquisition for clinical ULM.<i>Approach.</i>Quantitative indices, mainly including individual MB SNR, normalized cross-correlation (NCC) of the MB signal with the point-spread function, and the number of localizable MBs, were developed to evaluate MB signal quality and guide the selection of acquisition timing. The effects of transmitted voltage and dosage on signal quality for MB localization were also explored.<i>Main results</i>. In both pig and human studies, MB localization quality (primarily indicated by NCC) reached a minimum at peak MB concentration, then improved as MB counts decreased during the wash-out phase. An optimal acquisition window was identified by balancing localization quality (empirically, NCC > 0.57) and MB concentration. In the pig model, a relatively short time window (approximately 10 s) for optimal acquisition was identified during the rapid wash-out phase, highlighting the need for real-time MB signal monitoring during data acquisition. The slower wash-out phase in humans allowed for a more flexible imaging window of 1-2 min, while trade-offs were observed between localization quality and MB density (or acquisition length) at different wash-out phase timings. Guided by these findings, robust ULM imaging was achieved in both pig and human kidneys using a short period of data acquisition (3.6 s and 9.6 s of data), demonstrating its feasibility in clinical practice.<i>Significance.</i>This study provides insights into optimizing data acquisition for consistent and reproducible ULM, paving the way for its standardization and broader clinical applications.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(7)
Mayo Clinic (US), WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
5.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.