China’s Global Development Initiative and the 2030 Agenda: Natural Companions or Uncomfortable Bedfellows

Abstract In September 2021, the Chinese government launched the Global Development Initiative (GDI), a program aimed at financing the 2030 Agenda and promoting greener and more sustainable development. This article analyses the compatibility of the GDI with the 2030 Agenda, identifying points of convergence and departure. Despite the GDI’s rhetorical packaging as human-rights based and people-centred, the GDI appears to represent a predominantly needs-based approach to development focused on improving socio-economic wellbeing through targeted poverty alleviation programs. While the GDI is most likely to excel in the area of poverty alleviation, this article cautions that the decoupling of institutions and governance from development may prevent China from translating its investment in material wellbeing into long-run development in states with poor governance and weak institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Law and Development Review
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2024-0135
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Global Development Initiative and the 2030 Agenda: Natural Companions or Uncomfortable Bedfellows

Francesca Farrington, Nandini Ramanujam
The Law and Development Review
International Development and Aid
article

China’s Global Development Initiative and the 2030 Agenda: Natural Companions or Uncomfortable Bedfellows

Francesca Farrington, Nandini Ramanujam
article en

Abstract

Abstract In September 2021, the Chinese government launched the Global Development Initiative (GDI), a program aimed at financing the 2030 Agenda and promoting greener and more sustainable development. This article analyses the compatibility of the GDI with the 2030 Agenda, identifying points of convergence and departure. Despite the GDI’s rhetorical packaging as human-rights based and people-centred, the GDI appears to represent a predominantly needs-based approach to development focused on improving socio-economic wellbeing through targeted poverty alleviation programs. While the GDI is most likely to excel in the area of poverty alleviation, this article cautions that the decoupling of institutions and governance from development may prevent China from translating its investment in material wellbeing into long-run development in states with poor governance and weak institutions.

The Law and Development ReviewVol. 19(1)
University of Aberdeen (GB), McGill University (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China’s Global Development Initiative and the 2030 Agenda: Natural Companions or Uncomfortable Bedfellows — Francesca Farrington, Nandini Ramanujam · The Law and Development Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS