Prospects of scientific monitoring ,verification and reporting to support national and subnational GHG inventories

Scientific monitoring, verification and reporting (MRV) is necessary to independently examine the quality of national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories as assessment methods are inherently uncertain including systematic effects from biased input information and lack of knowledge. The atmospheric research community develops observation systems to monitor the large-scale net GHG exchange with remote sensing and tall tower based concentration field measurements and atmospheric transport model inversion techniques. Because the spatial and temporal scales of these approaches are too coarse for small nations and even more so for local government districts, we used an alternative direct method to estimate the GHG budget of an agricultural landscape in Denmark, the tall tower eddy covariance method. In the presentation, we will use this case study to illustrate the strengths and limitations of net GHG flux measurements to test against GHG inventories.We compared our one year’s data set of continuous GHG (CO2, N2O and CH4) flux measurements  with the estimates from IPCC based emission methods that were refined for the Danish agricultural landscape. We calculated GHG emissions and their uncertainties using the IPCC methods and propagated those to annual estimates. Likewise, we estimated the uncertainty for annual budgets from turbulent flux measurements including a number of factors that are deemed most important for the quality of net flux estimates.While the emission estimates for the non-CO2 GHG were at least similar, the IPCC inventory characterized the area as a net GHG source, whereas the measured fluxes determined a large GHG sink, owing to an overwhelming CO2 uptake.In our presentation, we will resolve this apparent contradiction and conclude on the strengths and limitation of MRV from scientific net GHG exchange approaches.Acknowledgement:We acknowledge funding by the Free Danish Research Council (DFF, grant number 1127-00308B) and the contribution of MSc. Victoria Abelenda and MSc. Isabel Lopez in their MSc. Project “Comprehensive Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions  (N2O, CO2, CH4) in Agricultural Practices: A Case Study from a Rural Area in Denmark”, Inst. of Resouce and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU) Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark (2024).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14671
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospects of scientific monitoring ,verification and reporting to support national and subnational GHG inventories

Susanne Wiesner, Charlotte Scheutz, Andreas Ibrom, Konstantinos Kissas et al.
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Prospects of scientific monitoring ,verification and reporting to support national and subnational GHG inventories

Susanne Wiesner, Charlotte Scheutz, Andreas Ibrom, Konstantinos Kissas, Ziqiong Wang, Anastasia Gorlenko
article en

Abstract

Scientific monitoring, verification and reporting (MRV) is necessary to independently examine the quality of national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories as assessment methods are inherently uncertain including systematic effects from biased input information and lack of knowledge. The atmospheric research community develops observation systems to monitor the large-scale net GHG exchange with remote sensing and tall tower based concentration field measurements and atmospheric transport model inversion techniques. Because the spatial and temporal scales of these approaches are too coarse for small nations and even more so for local government districts, we used an alternative direct method to estimate the GHG budget of an agricultural landscape in Denmark, the tall tower eddy covariance method. In the presentation, we will use this case study to illustrate the strengths and limitations of net GHG flux measurements to test against GHG inventories.We compared our one year’s data set of continuous GHG (CO2, N2O and CH4) flux measurements  with the estimates from IPCC based emission methods that were refined for the Danish agricultural landscape. We calculated GHG emissions and their uncertainties using the IPCC methods and propagated those to annual estimates. Likewise, we estimated the uncertainty for annual budgets from turbulent flux measurements including a number of factors that are deemed most important for the quality of net flux estimates.While the emission estimates for the non-CO2 GHG were at least similar, the IPCC inventory characterized the area as a net GHG source, whereas the measured fluxes determined a large GHG sink, owing to an overwhelming CO2 uptake.In our presentation, we will resolve this apparent contradiction and conclude on the strengths and limitation of MRV from scientific net GHG exchange approaches.Acknowledgement:We acknowledge funding by the Free Danish Research Council (DFF, grant number 1127-00308B) and the contribution of MSc. Victoria Abelenda and MSc. Isabel Lopez in their MSc. Project “Comprehensive Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions  (N2O, CO2, CH4) in Agricultural Practices: A Case Study from a Rural Area in Denmark”, Inst. of Resouce and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU) Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark (2024).

Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.