Medicaid Expansion, Uninsurance Rates, and Catastrophic Costs at the Time of Emergency Gynecologic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of Medicaid expansion on uninsurance rates and catastrophic charges from emergency surgical management of ectopic pregnancy and ovarian torsion using difference-in-difference analysis and to evaluate for racial and ethnic disparities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using 2012-2018 State Inpatient Data and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases in four states: Kentucky and Maryland (expansion) and Florida and North Carolina (nonexpansion). Patients undergoing surgical management of ovarian torsion or ectopic pregnancy were included. Logistic regression models were used controlling for year and expansion type; a difference-in-difference treatment indicator was used to evaluate changes in uninsurance rates and catastrophic spending (hospital charges more than 10% of estimated annual median income) among those uninsured. We then examined race and ethnicity for those uninsured before and after expansion by state. RESULTS: A total of 594,116 patients were included. Before expansion, the percent of patients uninsured was higher in nonexpansion states (6.5%) compared with expansion states (5.1%). After expansion, the percent uninsured decreased from 5.1% to 2.4% in expansion states compared with 6.5% to 5.3% in nonexpansion states. The interaction between expansion year and Medicaid expansion status was significant (P<.001). Pre-expansion percent catastrophic charges among uninsured patients were higher in nonexpansion states compared with expansion states (96.7% vs 85.7%). After expansion, the percent catastrophic financial burden remained higher at 96.9% in nonexpansion states compared with 82.5% in expansion states. The interaction between expansion year and Medicaid expansion status was significant (P<.001). The uninsured gap between Black or African American and White patients in expansion states after expansion was 0.5%-relatively unchanged-compared with 11.6% for Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients, an increase from 8.3% before expansion. CONCLUSION: Medicaid expansion was associated with reductions in uninsured hospitalizations and catastrophic charges after gynecologic surgical emergencies and was associated with differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/hv31-v517
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medicaid Expansion, Uninsurance Rates, and Catastrophic Costs at the Time of Emergency Gynecologic Surgery.

Shakthi Unnithan, Alaattin Erkanli, Haley A. Moss, Benjamin B. Albright et al.
UNC Libraries
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Medicaid Expansion, Uninsurance Rates, and Catastrophic Costs at the Time of Emergency Gynecologic Surgery.

Shakthi Unnithan, Alaattin Erkanli, Haley A. Moss, Benjamin B. Albright, Kristen Carrillo-Kappus
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of Medicaid expansion on uninsurance rates and catastrophic charges from emergency surgical management of ectopic pregnancy and ovarian torsion using difference-in-difference analysis and to evaluate for racial and ethnic disparities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using 2012-2018 State Inpatient Data and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases in four states: Kentucky and Maryland (expansion) and Florida and North Carolina (nonexpansion). Patients undergoing surgical management of ovarian torsion or ectopic pregnancy were included. Logistic regression models were used controlling for year and expansion type; a difference-in-difference treatment indicator was used to evaluate changes in uninsurance rates and catastrophic spending (hospital charges more than 10% of estimated annual median income) among those uninsured. We then examined race and ethnicity for those uninsured before and after expansion by state. RESULTS: A total of 594,116 patients were included. Before expansion, the percent of patients uninsured was higher in nonexpansion states (6.5%) compared with expansion states (5.1%). After expansion, the percent uninsured decreased from 5.1% to 2.4% in expansion states compared with 6.5% to 5.3% in nonexpansion states. The interaction between expansion year and Medicaid expansion status was significant (P<.001). Pre-expansion percent catastrophic charges among uninsured patients were higher in nonexpansion states compared with expansion states (96.7% vs 85.7%). After expansion, the percent catastrophic financial burden remained higher at 96.9% in nonexpansion states compared with 82.5% in expansion states. The interaction between expansion year and Medicaid expansion status was significant (P<.001). The uninsured gap between Black or African American and White patients in expansion states after expansion was 0.5%-relatively unchanged-compared with 11.6% for Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients, an increase from 8.3% before expansion. CONCLUSION: Medicaid expansion was associated with reductions in uninsured hospitalizations and catastrophic charges after gynecologic surgical emergencies and was associated with differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.