Identifying secondary stroke prevention treatment gaps in older patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Current guidelines for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) recommend oral anticoagulation (OAC). The risk of stroke is particularly increased in older patients and those with a history of stroke. Previous studies suggested up to 67% of eligible patients with NVAF are not prescribed OAC. <h3>Objective</h3> This study aimed to identify gaps in OAC prescribing patterns for older patients with NVAF and previous stroke to allow for optimization of OAC prescribing. <h3>Methods</h3> This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from a multispecialty group practice affiliated with a 178-bed community hospital. The sites are located in the Seacoast region of New Hampshire and Southern Maine. Participants included older adults aged 65-89 years with NVAF and previous stroke who were not prescribed OAC with at least1 ambulatory encounter between July 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023. Pharmacists identified patients using existing databases of ICD-10 codes, medication lists, and ambulatory clinic encounters. The primary outcome was to identify the cohort of patients not prescribed OAC. <h3>Results</h3> Among 391 eligible patients, 48 (12.3%) were not prescribed OAC therapy. Of the 48 elderly patients with NVAF and stroke history without OAC, 21 (43.5%) did not have a guideline-directed indication for OAC omission. Rationale for OAC omission included cost (6.3%), patient refusal (29.2%), bleeding from isolated trauma or procedural complication (4.2%), falls (18.8%), previous intracranial or intraspinal hemorrhage (8.3%), severe bleeding owing to nonreversible cause (4.2%), and transient NVAF (25%). Patients with Medicare were more likely to lack OAC (60%). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Not all patients who were indicated for OAC were prescribed OAC highlighting opportunity to improve prescribing practices. Uncovering real-world rationales for OAC omission equips pharmacists with valuable insights to address patient concerns effectively and highlights the critical role of pharmacist-led patient education in improving prescribing practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JAPhA Practice Innovations
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japhpi.2025.100035
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying secondary stroke prevention treatment gaps in older patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Kevin Le, Maureen Brady, Avon Child, Antonio Mercuro et al.
JAPhA Practice Innovations
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Identifying secondary stroke prevention treatment gaps in older patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Kevin Le, Maureen Brady, Avon Child, Antonio Mercuro, Jaclynne Gowen
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Current guidelines for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) recommend oral anticoagulation (OAC). The risk of stroke is particularly increased in older patients and those with a history of stroke. Previous studies suggested up to 67% of eligible patients with NVAF are not prescribed OAC. <h3>Objective</h3> This study aimed to identify gaps in OAC prescribing patterns for older patients with NVAF and previous stroke to allow for optimization of OAC prescribing. <h3>Methods</h3> This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from a multispecialty group practice affiliated with a 178-bed community hospital. The sites are located in the Seacoast region of New Hampshire and Southern Maine. Participants included older adults aged 65-89 years with NVAF and previous stroke who were not prescribed OAC with at least1 ambulatory encounter between July 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023. Pharmacists identified patients using existing databases of ICD-10 codes, medication lists, and ambulatory clinic encounters. The primary outcome was to identify the cohort of patients not prescribed OAC. <h3>Results</h3> Among 391 eligible patients, 48 (12.3%) were not prescribed OAC therapy. Of the 48 elderly patients with NVAF and stroke history without OAC, 21 (43.5%) did not have a guideline-directed indication for OAC omission. Rationale for OAC omission included cost (6.3%), patient refusal (29.2%), bleeding from isolated trauma or procedural complication (4.2%), falls (18.8%), previous intracranial or intraspinal hemorrhage (8.3%), severe bleeding owing to nonreversible cause (4.2%), and transient NVAF (25%). Patients with Medicare were more likely to lack OAC (60%). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Not all patients who were indicated for OAC were prescribed OAC highlighting opportunity to improve prescribing practices. Uncovering real-world rationales for OAC omission equips pharmacists with valuable insights to address patient concerns effectively and highlights the critical role of pharmacist-led patient education in improving prescribing practices.

JAPhA Practice InnovationsVol. 2(3)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.