J.B. Erhard and His “Devil’s Apology” (1795) in the Context of Early Discussions about Kantian Philosophy

The philosopher and physician Johann Benjamin Erhard (1766–1827) is a relatively little-studied, but very remarkable figure in the history of post-Kantian German thought. The peak of his creative activity occurred in the last decade of the 18th century – a time of heated dis­cussions around the philosophy of I. Kant, when a number of thinkers, who appreciated the nature of the transformations he carried out, tried to continue his undertaking, challenging the positions of philosophical opponents. Developing some of his claims and moving away from others, they often found themselves in ideological confrontation both with Kant himself and with other Kantians. Along with K.L. Reingold, S. Maimon, J.G. Fichte, T. Schmaltz, L.H. Jacob, C.Chr.E. Schmid and other influential successors (and at the same time critics) of Kantian philosophy, J.B. Erhard was in the thick of these discussions, the course of which is reflected in one of his main works, “Devil’s Apology” (1795). This article, which represents a preface to the translation of this work into Russian, will examine its main within the framework of a number of philosophical problems and disagreements that were of key importance at the dawn of the development of one of the most important traditions of European philosophy – German idealism. Particular attention within the frame­work of the article will be paid to the position of the personality of Erhard himself in the philo­sophical context of his time; in particular, his personal contacts with famous contemporaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethical Thought
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2024-24-2-138-149
Primary Topic
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

J.B. Erhard and His “Devil’s Apology” (1795) in the Context of Early Discussions about Kantian Philosophy

Fedor G. Anisimov
Ethical Thought
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
article

J.B. Erhard and His “Devil’s Apology” (1795) in the Context of Early Discussions about Kantian Philosophy

Fedor G. Anisimov
article en

Abstract

The philosopher and physician Johann Benjamin Erhard (1766–1827) is a relatively little-studied, but very remarkable figure in the history of post-Kantian German thought. The peak of his creative activity occurred in the last decade of the 18th century – a time of heated dis­cussions around the philosophy of I. Kant, when a number of thinkers, who appreciated the nature of the transformations he carried out, tried to continue his undertaking, challenging the positions of philosophical opponents. Developing some of his claims and moving away from others, they often found themselves in ideological confrontation both with Kant himself and with other Kantians. Along with K.L. Reingold, S. Maimon, J.G. Fichte, T. Schmaltz, L.H. Jacob, C.Chr.E. Schmid and other influential successors (and at the same time critics) of Kantian philosophy, J.B. Erhard was in the thick of these discussions, the course of which is reflected in one of his main works, “Devil’s Apology” (1795). This article, which represents a preface to the translation of this work into Russian, will examine its main within the framework of a number of philosophical problems and disagreements that were of key importance at the dawn of the development of one of the most important traditions of European philosophy – German idealism. Particular attention within the frame­work of the article will be paid to the position of the personality of Erhard himself in the philo­sophical context of his time; in particular, his personal contacts with famous contemporaries.

Ethical ThoughtVol. 24(2)
Russian State University for the Humanities (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.