Sakyamuni and Samantabhadra in the Collected Works of Shabkar (1781–1851)

This essay analyzes how Shabkar Tsokdruk Rangdrol (Zhabs dkar Tshogs drug Rang grol) (1781–1851) retells the story of Buddha Sakyamuni alongside the notion of the primordial buddha Samantabhadra in his collected works. Shabkar retells the story of Sakyamuni’s life and past lives in his Marvelous Emanated Scripture in order to teach his disciples how to practice Buddhism. Shabkar draws from texts in the Kangyur but embellishes them with details that are not present in versions of Sakyamuni’s biography commonly cited in the Tibetan bibliographic tradition. In his autobiography, Shabkar elaborates on the idea of the primordial buddha Samantabhadra in order to encourage his audience to adopt an impartial attitude toward sectarian difference. Shabkar reconciles these two concepts of buddhahood through the framework of “provisional” (drang don; Skt. neyartha) versus “definitive” meaning (nges pa’i don; Skt. nitartha).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buddhist Studies Review
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.33101
Primary Topic
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sakyamuni and Samantabhadra in the Collected Works of Shabkar (1781–1851)

Rachel H Pang
Buddhist Studies Review
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
article

Sakyamuni and Samantabhadra in the Collected Works of Shabkar (1781–1851)

Rachel H Pang
article en

Abstract

This essay analyzes how Shabkar Tsokdruk Rangdrol (Zhabs dkar Tshogs drug Rang grol) (1781–1851) retells the story of Buddha Sakyamuni alongside the notion of the primordial buddha Samantabhadra in his collected works. Shabkar retells the story of Sakyamuni’s life and past lives in his Marvelous Emanated Scripture in order to teach his disciples how to practice Buddhism. Shabkar draws from texts in the Kangyur but embellishes them with details that are not present in versions of Sakyamuni’s biography commonly cited in the Tibetan bibliographic tradition. In his autobiography, Shabkar elaborates on the idea of the primordial buddha Samantabhadra in order to encourage his audience to adopt an impartial attitude toward sectarian difference. Shabkar reconciles these two concepts of buddhahood through the framework of “provisional” (drang don; Skt. neyartha) versus “definitive” meaning (nges pa’i don; Skt. nitartha).

Buddhist Studies ReviewVol. 41(1-2)
Davidson College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sakyamuni and Samantabhadra in the Collected Works of Shabkar (1781–1851) — Rachel H Pang · Buddhist Studies Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS