Quanta emission rate during speaking and coughing mediated by indoor temperature and humidity
In epidemiological prospective modelling, assessing the hypothetical infectious quanta emission rate (E<sub>q</sub>) is critical for estimating airborne infection risk. Existing E<sub>q</sub> models overlook environmental factors such as indoor relative humidity (RH) and temperature (T), despite their importance to droplet evaporation dynamics. Here we include these environmental factors in a prospective E<sub>q</sub> model based on the airborne probability functions with emitted droplet distribution for speaking and coughing activities. Our results show relative humidity and temperature have substantial influence on E<sub>q</sub>. Drier environments exhibit a notable increase in suspended droplets (cf. moist environments), with E<sub>q</sub> having a 10-fold increase when RH decreases from 90 % to 20 % for coughing and a 2-fold increase for speaking at a representative summer indoor environment (T = 25° C). In warmer environments, E<sub>q</sub> values are consistently higher (cf. colder), with increases of up to 22 % for coughing and 9 % for speaking. This indicates temperature has a smaller impact than humidity. We demonstrate that indoor environmental conditions are important when quantifying the quanta emission rate using a prospective method. This is essential for assessing airborne infection risk.
Authors
- Zhiwen Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-3958)
- Jianjian Wei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-8462)
- Sue Grimmond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-9415)
- Omduth Coceal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0705-6755)
- Vitor Lavor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9346-7694)
Institutions
- Institute of Refrigeration (GB)
- University of Reading (GB)
- Cardiff University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environment International
- Published
- 2025-03-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109379
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Infection Control and Ventilation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.52