Comparison between four integer ambiguity resolved PPP GNSS time transfer software solutions

Abstract We present a comparison between four different software solutions (dubbed PPP-AR or IPPP, all based on the resolution of integer ambiguities of the carrier-phase) that compute time links between GNSS receivers. Additional processing layers have been specially developed to enable usage for time transfer purposes. A variety of GNSS receivers connected to UTC(k) timescales across the globe, covering a wide range of baselines and several GNSS receiver models was used in this work. For one of the links, the availability of an optical fiber link between the stations allowed a comparison of each software-based GNSS link to this common reference, otherwise links were compared with each other using a specially-developed four-cornered hat algorithm. In the performance analysis we focused on the frequency stability of the time links. Results show that all four independently developed software solutions agree within 20 ps on TDEV for all averaging times and highlight the importance of mitigating day-boundary phase discontinuities. This demonstrates the reliability of the different implementations of the PPP-AR/IPPP technique for operational time transfer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrologia
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/adbcae
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between four integer ambiguity resolved PPP GNSS time transfer software solutions

Giulio Tagliaferro, Frédéric Meynadier, Marina Gertsvolf, Bin Jian et al.
4 citations
Metrologia
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
4.99
article

Comparison between four integer ambiguity resolved PPP GNSS time transfer software solutions

Giulio Tagliaferro, Frédéric Meynadier, Marina Gertsvolf, Bin Jian, Antoine Baudiquez, Jiang Guo, Pascale Defraigne
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present a comparison between four different software solutions (dubbed PPP-AR or IPPP, all based on the resolution of integer ambiguities of the carrier-phase) that compute time links between GNSS receivers. Additional processing layers have been specially developed to enable usage for time transfer purposes. A variety of GNSS receivers connected to UTC(k) timescales across the globe, covering a wide range of baselines and several GNSS receiver models was used in this work. For one of the links, the availability of an optical fiber link between the stations allowed a comparison of each software-based GNSS link to this common reference, otherwise links were compared with each other using a specially-developed four-cornered hat algorithm. In the performance analysis we focused on the frequency stability of the time links. Results show that all four independently developed software solutions agree within 20 ps on TDEV for all averaging times and highlight the importance of mitigating day-boundary phase discontinuities. This demonstrates the reliability of the different implementations of the PPP-AR/IPPP technique for operational time transfer.

MetrologiaVol. 62(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Royal Observatory of Belgium (BE), Observatoire de Paris (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Systèmes de Référence Temps-Espace (FR), National Research Council Canada (CA), Bureau international des poids et mesures (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.