Investigating Communication Strategies in Face-to-Face and Synchronous Computer-Mediated Interactions Between Native English Speakers and Second Language Learners

Communication strategies interlocutors use to avoid or resolve potential problems in face-to-face (FTF) and computer-mediated interactions can facilitate English learners’ second language acquisition (SLA) (Smith, 2003). Such strategies are beneficial because they encourage English learners to practice the second language (L2), learn vocabulary, and notice new grammatical structures (Long, 1996). Few studies have compared speakers’ communication strategies in different modes and their effects on second language learning. This study addresses this gap by investigating how FTF and text-synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) task-based interactions impact the use of communication strategies, and to what extent native speakers (NSs) and L2 English learners differ regarding frequency and types of communication strategies used in both modes. Twelve participants were randomly paired to form six NS-L2 learner dyads. They completed a jigsaw task in each mode. Grounded theory was used to compare both modes. Findings revealed that FTF interactions promoted more communication strategies than text-SCMC, and regarding the number of strategies, NSs produced fewer than L2 learners. NSs and L2 learners differed regarding how frequently they applied certain communication strategies. To facilitate SLA, the findings suggest that teachers should teach NSs and L2 English learners how to implement communication strategies and engage them in FTF and text-SCMC interactions to encourage the use of these strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching (JSLAT)
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2458/jslat.5802
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Communication Strategies in Face-to-Face and Synchronous Computer-Mediated Interactions Between Native English Speakers and Second Language Learners

Angélica Ribeiro
The Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching (JSLAT)
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Investigating Communication Strategies in Face-to-Face and Synchronous Computer-Mediated Interactions Between Native English Speakers and Second Language Learners

Angélica Ribeiro
article en

Abstract

Communication strategies interlocutors use to avoid or resolve potential problems in face-to-face (FTF) and computer-mediated interactions can facilitate English learners’ second language acquisition (SLA) (Smith, 2003). Such strategies are beneficial because they encourage English learners to practice the second language (L2), learn vocabulary, and notice new grammatical structures (Long, 1996). Few studies have compared speakers’ communication strategies in different modes and their effects on second language learning. This study addresses this gap by investigating how FTF and text-synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) task-based interactions impact the use of communication strategies, and to what extent native speakers (NSs) and L2 English learners differ regarding frequency and types of communication strategies used in both modes. Twelve participants were randomly paired to form six NS-L2 learner dyads. They completed a jigsaw task in each mode. Grounded theory was used to compare both modes. Findings revealed that FTF interactions promoted more communication strategies than text-SCMC, and regarding the number of strategies, NSs produced fewer than L2 learners. NSs and L2 learners differed regarding how frequently they applied certain communication strategies. To facilitate SLA, the findings suggest that teachers should teach NSs and L2 English learners how to implement communication strategies and engage them in FTF and text-SCMC interactions to encourage the use of these strategies.

The Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching (JSLAT)Vol. 30(0)
University of Houston - Clear Lake (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.