Unleashing digital servitization and service innovation: how decision-making logics and organizational learning enable coping with implementation process complexities

Purpose This study aims to explore how different decision-making logics (DML) and organizational learning (OL) styles are used and combined by project managers to navigate the complexities of Digital Servitization (DS) and Digital Service Innovation (DSI) projects. Specifically, the research shows the impact and interplay between the two managerial levers OL and team-level DML, and how these influence and substitute each other. Design/methodology/approach It builds on a retrospective longitudinal study of project-level cases within a high-tech multinational company active in the aerospace industry and applies a systematic combining approach and narrative analysis of critical, decisive events. The research zooms in on the application of OL (i.e. adaptive versus generative learning) and DML (effectuation versus causation) while coping with the experienced complexity during the implementation process. Findings Teams seek relief from complexities during the DS/DSI journeys by combining different managerial levers over time. The paper develops a mid-range theory with propositions and outlines practical recommendations. Research limitations/implications This study’s research limitations include its single-sector focus and reliance on a small number of case studies, which does not allow generalization across industries or different contexts. Future research should explore diverse industries and incorporate broader quantitative methods to validate the proposed managerial frameworks. Originality/value A framework describing how managers alternate DML and OL styles during their DS/DSI transitions is developed. Contrary to earlier belief, the alternations of logics and styles do not follow a “predetermined sequence” as planned but are developing rather in a flexible, recurrent and emergent manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-05-2024-0238
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unleashing digital servitization and service innovation: how decision-making logics and organizational learning enable coping with implementation process complexities

Paul Matthyssens, Wouter Van Bockhaven, Clemens Friedl
3 citations
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
Service and Product Innovation
6.22
article

Unleashing digital servitization and service innovation: how decision-making logics and organizational learning enable coping with implementation process complexities

Paul Matthyssens, Wouter Van Bockhaven, Clemens Friedl
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore how different decision-making logics (DML) and organizational learning (OL) styles are used and combined by project managers to navigate the complexities of Digital Servitization (DS) and Digital Service Innovation (DSI) projects. Specifically, the research shows the impact and interplay between the two managerial levers OL and team-level DML, and how these influence and substitute each other. Design/methodology/approach It builds on a retrospective longitudinal study of project-level cases within a high-tech multinational company active in the aerospace industry and applies a systematic combining approach and narrative analysis of critical, decisive events. The research zooms in on the application of OL (i.e. adaptive versus generative learning) and DML (effectuation versus causation) while coping with the experienced complexity during the implementation process. Findings Teams seek relief from complexities during the DS/DSI journeys by combining different managerial levers over time. The paper develops a mid-range theory with propositions and outlines practical recommendations. Research limitations/implications This study’s research limitations include its single-sector focus and reliance on a small number of case studies, which does not allow generalization across industries or different contexts. Future research should explore diverse industries and incorporate broader quantitative methods to validate the proposed managerial frameworks. Originality/value A framework describing how managers alternate DML and OL styles during their DS/DSI transitions is developed. Contrary to earlier belief, the alternations of logics and styles do not follow a “predetermined sequence” as planned but are developing rather in a flexible, recurrent and emergent manner.

Journal of Enterprise Information Management
Antwerp Management School (BE), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Service and Product Innovation
6.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.