Trials and Tribulations of a Urinary Incontinence Screening Tool
Online screening for UI is feasible. The observation that only 21% of patients had conversations with their providers about their symptoms during the appointment, even after the provider was notified of the positive screen, suggests the need for better tools, such as alerts in the medical record, to enhance provider awareness of their patients' UI.
Authors
- Joshua M. Pevnick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0621-1485)
- Falisha Kanji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0163-2782)
- Catherine Bresee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-4906)
- Claire Burton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8126-6895)
- Jennifer T. Anger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-5941)
- Neil S. Wenger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-3967)
- Tara Cohen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-6093)
- Teryl K. Nuckols (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0416-1595)
Institutions
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- City of Hope (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Urogynecology
- Published
- 2025-03-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001678
- Primary Topic
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00