Efbemalenograstim Alfa, a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Fusion Protein Without PEGylation, Versus Pegfilgrastim for Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Breast Cancer: Results of a Phase III Randomized N

PURPOSE This phase III noninferiority (NI) trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of efbemalenograstim alfa, a novel non-PEGylated, long-acting, human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN), in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult patients with stage I-III invasive breast cancer (n = 393) undergoing docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single fixed dose of efbemalenograstim alfa or pegfilgrastim 24 hours after each chemotherapy administration. The primary objective was to demonstrate NI or potential superiority of efbemalenograstim alfa compared with pegfilgrastim. The primary end point is the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1 with a NI margin of 0.6 days. Additional end points included incidence of severe neutropenia (ISN), febrile neutropenia, infections, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS Among patients randomly assigned to efbemalenograstim alfa (n = 197), the mean DSN in cycle one was 0.2 ± 0.51 days, compared with 0.2 ± 0.45 days for the pegfilgrastim group (n = 196), with a CI of –0.1 to 0.1 days ( P = .7) for the treatment comparison, confirming NI. There was a lower ISN in those receiving efbemalenograstim alfa at cycle 4 ( P = .050). Lower ISN in later cycles was observed in all three efbemalenograstim alfa phase III trials. Treatment with efbemalenograstim alfa was safe, with low incidences of serious AEs and TEAEs, and an overall safety profile comparable with the pegfilgrastim group. Similar to ISN, fewer grade 4 neutropenias in the efbemalenograstim alfa group were observed compared with pegfilgrastim. CONCLUSION Results demonstrated that efbemalenograstim alfa was noninferior to current CIN therapy (pegfilgrastim) with comparable efficacy and safety profiles in cycle 1 and showed evidence of less neutropenia in later cycles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO oncology advances.
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/oa-24-00074
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efbemalenograstim Alfa, a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Fusion Protein Without PEGylation, Versus Pegfilgrastim for Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Breast Cancer: Results of a Phase III Randomized N

Sergei Tjulandin, Igor Bondarenko, Michael Auerbach, John A. Glaspy
5 citations
JCO oncology advances.
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
5.23
article

Efbemalenograstim Alfa, a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Fusion Protein Without PEGylation, Versus Pegfilgrastim for Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Breast Cancer: Results of a Phase III Randomized N

Sergei Tjulandin, Igor Bondarenko, Michael Auerbach, John A. Glaspy
article en
5 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE This phase III noninferiority (NI) trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of efbemalenograstim alfa, a novel non-PEGylated, long-acting, human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN), in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult patients with stage I-III invasive breast cancer (n = 393) undergoing docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single fixed dose of efbemalenograstim alfa or pegfilgrastim 24 hours after each chemotherapy administration. The primary objective was to demonstrate NI or potential superiority of efbemalenograstim alfa compared with pegfilgrastim. The primary end point is the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1 with a NI margin of 0.6 days. Additional end points included incidence of severe neutropenia (ISN), febrile neutropenia, infections, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS Among patients randomly assigned to efbemalenograstim alfa (n = 197), the mean DSN in cycle one was 0.2 ± 0.51 days, compared with 0.2 ± 0.45 days for the pegfilgrastim group (n = 196), with a CI of –0.1 to 0.1 days ( P = .7) for the treatment comparison, confirming NI. There was a lower ISN in those receiving efbemalenograstim alfa at cycle 4 ( P = .050). Lower ISN in later cycles was observed in all three efbemalenograstim alfa phase III trials. Treatment with efbemalenograstim alfa was safe, with low incidences of serious AEs and TEAEs, and an overall safety profile comparable with the pegfilgrastim group. Similar to ISN, fewer grade 4 neutropenias in the efbemalenograstim alfa group were observed compared with pegfilgrastim. CONCLUSION Results demonstrated that efbemalenograstim alfa was noninferior to current CIN therapy (pegfilgrastim) with comparable efficacy and safety profiles in cycle 1 and showed evidence of less neutropenia in later cycles.

JCO oncology advances.(2)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Georgetown University (US), Auerbach Associates (United States) (US), Dnipro State Medical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
5.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.