Making the Case for Case Management

Due to recent athlete advocacy and changing organizational policy, sport organizations need to implement policies and procedures to meet the mental health needs of athletes. Scholars have suggested that a holistic approach—addressing an athletes’ mental, social, spiritual, and physical health — is the most effective care. However, the sport industry lacks a practical and interprofessional model of care that encapsulates holistic wellness of athletes on an individual and systematic level. To address this gap, this conceptual study reviewed the strengths and limitations of eight different evidence-based healthcare models to understand what an empirically based, athlete-specific holistic model of care could look like. Although all models had their strengths, most take an individualistic approach and do not offer implementation tactics that can be adapted to sport organizations. Taking these critiques, we proposed three best practices that emphasize an athlete-centered, collaborative approach: (1) taking an interdisciplinary approach, (2) hiring case managers, and (3) investing in top-down organizational training

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport Social Work Journal
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33043/27dc47cz3
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making the Case for Case Management

Hannah Kloetzer, Lauren Beasley
Sport Social Work Journal
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Making the Case for Case Management

Hannah Kloetzer, Lauren Beasley
article en

Abstract

Due to recent athlete advocacy and changing organizational policy, sport organizations need to implement policies and procedures to meet the mental health needs of athletes. Scholars have suggested that a holistic approach—addressing an athletes’ mental, social, spiritual, and physical health — is the most effective care. However, the sport industry lacks a practical and interprofessional model of care that encapsulates holistic wellness of athletes on an individual and systematic level. To address this gap, this conceptual study reviewed the strengths and limitations of eight different evidence-based healthcare models to understand what an empirically based, athlete-specific holistic model of care could look like. Although all models had their strengths, most take an individualistic approach and do not offer implementation tactics that can be adapted to sport organizations. Taking these critiques, we proposed three best practices that emphasize an athlete-centered, collaborative approach: (1) taking an interdisciplinary approach, (2) hiring case managers, and (3) investing in top-down organizational training

Sport Social Work JournalVol. 7(1)
Georgia State University (US), University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Making the Case for Case Management — Hannah Kloetzer, Lauren Beasley · Sport Social Work Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS