Assessing <i>E. coli</i> levels in surface soils of informal settlements using boot sock and standard grab methods
Rapid urbanization leads to the growth of informal settlements, where inadequate sanitation infrastructure is common, thus promoting environmental contamination and risk of gastrointestinal infection. Soil contamination contributes to the transmission of enteropathogens, but traditional sampling approaches may poorly indicate public health risks due to limited spatial representation. This study compares traditional grab sampling of soil with a boot sock method, a composite technique designed to better reflect human-pathogen interactions. The boot sock method provided more sensitive detection of <i>E. coli</i> and lower inter-replicate variation compared to grab samples. Post hoc power analyses indicated that the boot sock technique required fewer samples to achieve adequate spatial representation across a sampling area than grab samples, potentially improving time and cost efficiency in pathogen exposure risk estimation.
Authors
- Maghfira Saifuddaolah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2765-9580)
- Rebekah Henry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6530-8557)
- John D. Boyce (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-3074)
- Fiona Lynch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0443-3511)
- Karin S Leder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1368-1039)
- Ruzka R. Taruc (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4208-4957)
- Autiko Tela
- Fiona Barker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9203-5766)
- Andi Zulkifli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-5852)
- Lamiya Bata
- David McCarthy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8845-6501)
- Zainal Handis
- Silvia Rosovoa Vilsoni
- Revoni Vamosi
Institutions
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Discovery Institute (US)
- Monash University (AU)
- Fiji National University (FJ)
- University of Guelph (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2025-03-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq9869
- Primary Topic
- Fecal contamination and water quality
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00