Radiometric field inter-comparison of fiducial reference measurements using an open source community processor
A radiometric field intercomparison was conducted at the Acqua Alta Oceanographic Tower (AAOT) in the Adriatic Sea from 14 to 21 July 2022 to assess differences in the accuracy of above-water radiometer systems (Sea-Bird HyperSAS, pySAS, TriOS-RAMSES) processed using an open-source community processor (HyperCP). Class-based and sensor-specific characteristics of the radiometers were used to determine the quantities <i>E</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>), <i>L</i><sub><i>sky</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>), <i>L</i><sub><i>t</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>) and <i>R</i><sub><i>rs</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>), and their associated uncertainties. Using sensor-specific characteristics, the differences among systems were 2% for <i>E</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>), <i>L</i><sub><i>sky</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>), <i>L</i><sub><i>t</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>) and 2.5% for <i>R</i><sub><i>rs</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>) and the uncertainties were 1.5%, 2%, 1.5% and 5%, respectively. The differences were higher when using class-based characteristics. <i>L</i><sub><i>wn</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>) values were also compared to the above-water AERONET-OC SeaPRiSM and in-water HyperPro II. For SeaPRiSM, the differences and uncertainties were <5% over blue and green bands when using Mobley [App. Opt.38, 7442 (1999)10.1364/AO.38.007442] sea surface reflectance factors (ρ) and no NIR correction. For HyperPro II the differences were larger but were reduced when <i>R</i><sub><i>rs</i></sub>(<i>λ</i>) from the above-water systems was computed using ρ from Zhang et al. [Opt. Express25, A1 (2017)10.1364/OE.25.0000A1] with similarity (sim) spectrum (spec) NIR correction. HyperCP using sensor-specific characteristics is highly recommended to reduce the associated uncertainties and to produce the highest quality data for satellite OC validation.
Authors
- Martin Ligi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-5719)
- Giorgio Dall’Olmo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3931-4675)
- Juan Ignacio Gossn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-6882)
- Viktor Vabson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0963-706X)
- Gavin H. Tilstone (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-1682)
- Agnieszka Białek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4502-2687)
- Martin Hieronymi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-1562)
- Dirk Aurin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5340-9318)
- A.J. Ramsay
- Charles Kovach
- Ewa Kwiatkowska (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1602-5301)
- Michael Ondrusek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5311-9094)
- Riho Vendt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-0772)
- Thomas Jordan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2096-8858)
- Alexis Déru
- Giuseppe Zibordi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2253-1828)
- Ilmar Ansko
Institutions
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- National Physical Laboratory (GB)
- Southeastern Universities Research Association (US)
- European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (DE)
- NOAA National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (US)
- NOAA Center for Satellite Applications and Research (US)
- Carbon180 (US)
- National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics (IT)
- University of Tartu (EE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Optics Express
- Published
- 2025-03-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.551042
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.60
Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites
- Natural Environment Research Council