A seasonal assessment of indoor air quality and thermal performance in naturally ventilated airtight energy-efficient dwellings

• Seasonal IAQ assessment in naturally-ventilated energy-efficient dwellings. • Natural ventilation was insufficient to maintain adequate IAQ. • PM 2.5 exceeded guidelines for the majority of the monitoring time. • Air exchange rate range was 0.08–0.35 h -1 in summer and 0.08 to 0.26 h -1 in winter. Increased building energy performance requires improved thermal performance, elevating the risk of overheating and necessitating cooling strategies. Natural ventilation possesses the advantage of reducing cooling energy consumption in warmer seasons. Nevertheless, a consequence is decreased airflow in energy-efficient structures employing enhanced airtightness. This research evaluated the effectiveness of natural ventilation in maintaining acceptable indoor air quality in energy-efficient airtight households with no centralised active ventilation systems. Bedrooms, living rooms, and kitchens were monitored for a week during summer and winter. Indoor air pollutants included PM 2.5 , CO 2 , TVOCs, NO 2 , CO, beside temperature and relative humidity. Bedroom air exchange rates were extrapolated based on the metabolic CO 2 method. Results: Higher ( p < 0.01) concentrations of gaseous pollutants were measured in bedrooms than in living rooms, and in winter than in summer. PM 2.5 concentrations exceeded the 24-hour WHO guidelines in kitchens (92% in winter, 51% in summer). CO 2 concentrations were above 1000 ppm for 94% of the sleeping time in bedrooms in winter, and 39% in summer. Weekly TVOC concentrations across the bedrooms were 463 ppb in winter and 293 ppb in summer. Temperature and humidity were broadly within acceptable limits. Air exchange rate ranged across the bedrooms from 0.08 to 0.35 h -1 in summer and from 0.09 to 0.26 h -1 in winter. Ventilation performance gap was identified between the design and operational performance based on the current operational strategy. The findings highlight significant seasonal variations in indoor pollutant concentrations and underscore the need to improve ventilation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112862
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A seasonal assessment of indoor air quality and thermal performance in naturally ventilated airtight energy-efficient dwellings

James A. McGrath, Divyanshu Sood, Miriam Byrne, James O’Donnell et al.
8 citations
Building and Environment
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
8.05
article

A seasonal assessment of indoor air quality and thermal performance in naturally ventilated airtight energy-efficient dwellings

James A. McGrath, Divyanshu Sood, Miriam Byrne, James O’Donnell, Ibrahim Alhindawi
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• Seasonal IAQ assessment in naturally-ventilated energy-efficient dwellings. • Natural ventilation was insufficient to maintain adequate IAQ. • PM 2.5 exceeded guidelines for the majority of the monitoring time. • Air exchange rate range was 0.08–0.35 h -1 in summer and 0.08 to 0.26 h -1 in winter. Increased building energy performance requires improved thermal performance, elevating the risk of overheating and necessitating cooling strategies. Natural ventilation possesses the advantage of reducing cooling energy consumption in warmer seasons. Nevertheless, a consequence is decreased airflow in energy-efficient structures employing enhanced airtightness. This research evaluated the effectiveness of natural ventilation in maintaining acceptable indoor air quality in energy-efficient airtight households with no centralised active ventilation systems. Bedrooms, living rooms, and kitchens were monitored for a week during summer and winter. Indoor air pollutants included PM 2.5 , CO 2 , TVOCs, NO 2 , CO, beside temperature and relative humidity. Bedroom air exchange rates were extrapolated based on the metabolic CO 2 method. Results: Higher ( p < 0.01) concentrations of gaseous pollutants were measured in bedrooms than in living rooms, and in winter than in summer. PM 2.5 concentrations exceeded the 24-hour WHO guidelines in kitchens (92% in winter, 51% in summer). CO 2 concentrations were above 1000 ppm for 94% of the sleeping time in bedrooms in winter, and 39% in summer. Weekly TVOC concentrations across the bedrooms were 463 ppb in winter and 293 ppb in summer. Temperature and humidity were broadly within acceptable limits. Air exchange rate ranged across the bedrooms from 0.08 to 0.35 h -1 in summer and from 0.09 to 0.26 h -1 in winter. Ventilation performance gap was identified between the design and operational performance based on the current operational strategy. The findings highlight significant seasonal variations in indoor pollutant concentrations and underscore the need to improve ventilation strategies.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 276
University College Dublin (IE), National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
8.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.