Evaluating Financial Performance of Companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index Using the CRITIC-MABAC Method

Companies need to monitor their financial performance and update their strategies to establish sustainable financial structures. Therefore, they analyze their financial performance using various analytical approaches. This study examines financial performance analysis using the MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) approach to observe companies' financial performance and determine their performance levels relative to competitors within their respective indices. In this context, the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria)–MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) method is applied to financial performance analysis. The objective criteria weighting method, CRITIC, is used to prioritize financial performance criteria, while the MABAC method determines and ranks companies' financial performance. The study applies the CRITIC–MABAC method to assess the 2023 financial performance of the top ten companies listed in the Borsa Istanbul (BIST) Sustainability Index. The decision model includes twelve financial performance criteria. According to the findings, the most significant criterion is identified as the Cost of Goods Sold. Among the companies analyzed, Turkish Airlines Inc. (THYAO) is determined to have the highest financial performance. The robustness and consistency of the results are supported by sensitivity and comparative analyses. The study concludes with key insights and recommendations for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spectrum of Operational Research.
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31181/sor21202530
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Financial Performance of Companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index Using the CRITIC-MABAC Method

Galip Cihan Yalçın, Karahan Kara, Hamide Özyürek
7 citations
Spectrum of Operational Research.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
14.75
article

Evaluating Financial Performance of Companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index Using the CRITIC-MABAC Method

Galip Cihan Yalçın, Karahan Kara, Hamide Özyürek
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Companies need to monitor their financial performance and update their strategies to establish sustainable financial structures. Therefore, they analyze their financial performance using various analytical approaches. This study examines financial performance analysis using the MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) approach to observe companies' financial performance and determine their performance levels relative to competitors within their respective indices. In this context, the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria)–MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) method is applied to financial performance analysis. The objective criteria weighting method, CRITIC, is used to prioritize financial performance criteria, while the MABAC method determines and ranks companies' financial performance. The study applies the CRITIC–MABAC method to assess the 2023 financial performance of the top ten companies listed in the Borsa Istanbul (BIST) Sustainability Index. The decision model includes twelve financial performance criteria. According to the findings, the most significant criterion is identified as the Cost of Goods Sold. Among the companies analyzed, Turkish Airlines Inc. (THYAO) is determined to have the highest financial performance. The robustness and consistency of the results are supported by sensitivity and comparative analyses. The study concludes with key insights and recommendations for future research.

Spectrum of Operational Research.Vol. 2(1)
Izmir University (TR), Ostim Technical University (TR), İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
14.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.