Authenticity at the heart of communication

Abstract Authenticity has become a defining issue in contemporary communication, with challenges spanning fake identities, mis/disinformation, AI-generated hallucinations, and identity performance online. Following Lee’s (2020) authenticity model of mediated communication, I first examine authenticity through three key dimensions—source, message, and interaction authenticity—highlighting real-world cases that illustrate the evolving nature of trust and deception in digital environments. Drawing upon recent research, I explore how individuals authenticate communication, the cognitive and motivational factors shaping truth discernment, and the role of communication channels in influencing authenticity judgments. I then argue that fostering a trustworthy communication ecosystem, rather than simply encouraging blind trust, is essential to navigating the current authenticity crisis. As communication scholars are uniquely positioned to address these challenges through rigorous scholarship, I propose five research priorities: expanding beyond communication media, prioritizing social engagement, promoting “communication for good,” humanizing communication research, and synthesizing across research traditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Communication
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf005
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authenticity at the heart of communication

Eun-Ju Lee
6 citations
Journal of Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
25.21
article

Authenticity at the heart of communication

Eun-Ju Lee
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Authenticity has become a defining issue in contemporary communication, with challenges spanning fake identities, mis/disinformation, AI-generated hallucinations, and identity performance online. Following Lee’s (2020) authenticity model of mediated communication, I first examine authenticity through three key dimensions—source, message, and interaction authenticity—highlighting real-world cases that illustrate the evolving nature of trust and deception in digital environments. Drawing upon recent research, I explore how individuals authenticate communication, the cognitive and motivational factors shaping truth discernment, and the role of communication channels in influencing authenticity judgments. I then argue that fostering a trustworthy communication ecosystem, rather than simply encouraging blind trust, is essential to navigating the current authenticity crisis. As communication scholars are uniquely positioned to address these challenges through rigorous scholarship, I propose five research priorities: expanding beyond communication media, prioritizing social engagement, promoting “communication for good,” humanizing communication research, and synthesizing across research traditions.

Journal of CommunicationVol. 75(2)
Intel (United States) (US), Seoul National University (KR), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Trustworthy Computing (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.