Comparative Analysis of AI Literacy Education in the World and Korea, and Policy Recommendations

This paper aims to provide valuable insights into AI literacy education by conducting an in-depth comparative analysis of leading educational models in the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, and China. The study identifies unique and innovative approaches to AI literacy education while exploring how these countries have seamlessly integrated AI education across all stages, from early childhood to adulthood. The research emphasizes the importance of introducing AI concepts early in a student’s educational journey, highlighting the critical role that experimental and project-based learning play in cultivating practical skills and deep understanding. Furthermore, the findings underscore the importance of implementing ethical AI education that addresses the social and moral implications of AI technologies. The study also advocates for the development of government-driven policies and international collaboration to establish standardized AI literacy curricula that can be adapted globally. Unlike existing studies that mainly provide overviews of general trends, this research offers a more comprehensive analysis by considering both theoretical pedagogical frameworks and practical applications in the reality of educational settings. By presenting these multifaceted perspectives, the paper contributes valuable insights and practical recommendations that can guide future lead actions aimed at enhancing AI literacy on a global scale.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korea Multimedia Society
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2025.28.2.317
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of AI Literacy Education in the World and Korea, and Policy Recommendations

Dianmin Kang, Kyungla Kang
Journal of Korea Multimedia Society
Education and Learning Interventions
article

Comparative Analysis of AI Literacy Education in the World and Korea, and Policy Recommendations

Dianmin Kang, Kyungla Kang
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to provide valuable insights into AI literacy education by conducting an in-depth comparative analysis of leading educational models in the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, and China. The study identifies unique and innovative approaches to AI literacy education while exploring how these countries have seamlessly integrated AI education across all stages, from early childhood to adulthood. The research emphasizes the importance of introducing AI concepts early in a student’s educational journey, highlighting the critical role that experimental and project-based learning play in cultivating practical skills and deep understanding. Furthermore, the findings underscore the importance of implementing ethical AI education that addresses the social and moral implications of AI technologies. The study also advocates for the development of government-driven policies and international collaboration to establish standardized AI literacy curricula that can be adapted globally. Unlike existing studies that mainly provide overviews of general trends, this research offers a more comprehensive analysis by considering both theoretical pedagogical frameworks and practical applications in the reality of educational settings. By presenting these multifaceted perspectives, the paper contributes valuable insights and practical recommendations that can guide future lead actions aimed at enhancing AI literacy on a global scale.

Journal of Korea Multimedia SocietyVol. 28(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.