Spatial pattern and driving mechanisms of dryland landscape ecological risk: Insights from an integrated geographic detector and machine learning model

• Drylands are highly sensitive and vulnerable to global climate and land use changes. • Reveals 30-year landscape ecological risk patterns in the arid Tarim River Basin. • Introduces machine learning to identify nonlinear ecological risk drivers in drylands. • Highlights spatial clustering of ecological risks with dominant natural drivers. Drylands are among the most vulnerable and sensitive regions to global climate and land use changes. As one of the largest inland arid river basins, the Tarim River Basin exhibits diverse land use patterns that have exacerbated ecological risks, degraded the environment, and heightened ecosystem vulnerability. This study analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of landscape ecological risks in the basin from 1990 to 2020 using a landscape ecological risk model. A novel combination of the geographic detector and machine learning was employed to identify the nonlinear driving mechanisms of ecological risk. Key findings include: (1) Unused land dominated the basin, with land use showing “three increases and three decreases” trends: increases in cropland, construction land, and unused land, and decreases in grassland, water bodies, and forested areas. (2) High-risk areas were predominant, increasing by 2.31%, while low- and medium-risk areas declined by 0.60% and 1.49%, respectively. (3) Ecological risks transitioned from dispersed to aggregated patterns, with significant clustering of high- and low-risk zones. (4) Elevation, NDVI, and distance to urban centers were key drivers in single-factor analyses, while dual-factor interactions, particularly involving NDVI, consistently enhanced risk. These findings elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of land use and ecological risks, offering insights for ecological management and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113305
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial pattern and driving mechanisms of dryland landscape ecological risk: Insights from an integrated geographic detector and machine learning model

Qianli Chen, Xiaobin Jin, Hongtao Zhou, Paruke Wusimanjiang et al.
21 citations
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
23.21
article

Spatial pattern and driving mechanisms of dryland landscape ecological risk: Insights from an integrated geographic detector and machine learning model

Qianli Chen, Xiaobin Jin, Hongtao Zhou, Paruke Wusimanjiang, Min Gong, Bo Han, Ayiturxun Shamuxi, Abudureheman Abudukerimu
article en
21 citations

Abstract

• Drylands are highly sensitive and vulnerable to global climate and land use changes. • Reveals 30-year landscape ecological risk patterns in the arid Tarim River Basin. • Introduces machine learning to identify nonlinear ecological risk drivers in drylands. • Highlights spatial clustering of ecological risks with dominant natural drivers. Drylands are among the most vulnerable and sensitive regions to global climate and land use changes. As one of the largest inland arid river basins, the Tarim River Basin exhibits diverse land use patterns that have exacerbated ecological risks, degraded the environment, and heightened ecosystem vulnerability. This study analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of landscape ecological risks in the basin from 1990 to 2020 using a landscape ecological risk model. A novel combination of the geographic detector and machine learning was employed to identify the nonlinear driving mechanisms of ecological risk. Key findings include: (1) Unused land dominated the basin, with land use showing “three increases and three decreases” trends: increases in cropland, construction land, and unused land, and decreases in grassland, water bodies, and forested areas. (2) High-risk areas were predominant, increasing by 2.31%, while low- and medium-risk areas declined by 0.60% and 1.49%, respectively. (3) Ecological risks transitioned from dispersed to aggregated patterns, with significant clustering of high- and low-risk zones. (4) Elevation, NDVI, and distance to urban centers were key drivers in single-factor analyses, while dual-factor interactions, particularly involving NDVI, consistently enhanced risk. These findings elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of land use and ecological risks, offering insights for ecological management and sustainable development.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 172
Xinjiang Agricultural University (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
23.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.