How Similar Are Students’ Aggregated State Emotions to Their Self-Reported Trait Emotions? Results from a Measurement Burst Design Across Three School Years

Authors

Oliver Lüdtke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9744-3059)
Melanie M. Keller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0877-9779)
Takuya Yanagida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9052-4841)
Thomas Goetz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8908-2166)

Institutions

University of Vienna (AT)
Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)

Publication Details

Journal: Educational Psychology Review
Published: 2025-03-01
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09995-1
Citations: 4
Primary Topic: Mental Health Research Topics
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 8.47

Funders

National Science Foundation
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

How Similar Are Students’ Aggregated State Emotions to Their Self-Reported Trait Emotions? Results from a Measurement Burst Design Across Three School Years

Oliver Lüdtke, Melanie M. Keller, Takuya Yanagida, Thomas Goetz

Mar 1, 2025

4 citations

Educational Psychology Review

Mental Health Research Topics

8.47

article

How Similar Are Students’ Aggregated State Emotions to Their Self-Reported Trait Emotions? Results from a Measurement Burst Design Across Three School Years

Oliver Lüdtke, Melanie M. Keller, Takuya Yanagida, Thomas Goetz

March 1, 2025article en

4 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 37(1)

University of Vienna (AT), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)

National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Quality Education

Openalex Percentile: Top 3%

Mental Health Research Topics

8.47

DOI Open Access PDF OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.