Putting peer support into action in the OU library’s enquiries team

Purpose The Open University Library’s Enquiries team developed and implemented a peer support and review process within its service. The aim was to develop a mechanism for staff that is supportive, shares good practice and informs learning and service improvement. Design/methodology/approach In this case study, members of the Enquiries team were randomly assigned into small groups that met every other month to provide constructive feedback on how they responded to customer enquiries. Enquiries were evaluated based on criteria such as the use of template answers, tone, referral procedures and consideration of EDI principles. Feedback collected from the groups was shared with the whole team during the Enquiries team meetings. Findings Our team has already seen benefits from the process which confirms it as a promising and useful tool we can use to improve our service. It allows the team to identify training gaps and areas for improvement as well as share best practice. Adjustments had to be made to the sessions’ frequency based on staff workload capacity. Concerns regarding the exposure of confidential information were also addressed. Originality/value We feel our approach is innovative and unique because it is tailored to the needs of the Enquiries team of a distance-learning institution. Our approach emphasises collaboration, reflective practice and continuous improvement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-12-2023-0045
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Putting peer support into action in the OU library’s enquiries team

Ute Manecke, Vasileia Tsiplaki, Michael Blunt
1 links
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Reflective Practices in Education
article

Putting peer support into action in the OU library’s enquiries team

Ute Manecke, Vasileia Tsiplaki, Michael Blunt
article en

Abstract

Purpose The Open University Library’s Enquiries team developed and implemented a peer support and review process within its service. The aim was to develop a mechanism for staff that is supportive, shares good practice and informs learning and service improvement. Design/methodology/approach In this case study, members of the Enquiries team were randomly assigned into small groups that met every other month to provide constructive feedback on how they responded to customer enquiries. Enquiries were evaluated based on criteria such as the use of template answers, tone, referral procedures and consideration of EDI principles. Feedback collected from the groups was shared with the whole team during the Enquiries team meetings. Findings Our team has already seen benefits from the process which confirms it as a promising and useful tool we can use to improve our service. It allows the team to identify training gaps and areas for improvement as well as share best practice. Adjustments had to be made to the sessions’ frequency based on staff workload capacity. Concerns regarding the exposure of confidential information were also addressed. Originality/value We feel our approach is innovative and unique because it is tailored to the needs of the Enquiries team of a distance-learning institution. Our approach emphasises collaboration, reflective practice and continuous improvement.

Performance Measurement and MetricsVol. 26(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Reflective Practices in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Putting peer support into action in the OU library’s enquiries team — Ute Manecke, Vasileia Tsiplaki, et al. · Performance Measurement and Metrics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS