Parietal alpha and theta power predict cognitive training gains in middle-aged adults

Research on executive functions training shows inconsistent outcomes, with factors like age, baseline cognitive abilities, and personality traits implicated as predictive of training gains, while limited attention has been given to neurophysiological markers. Theta and alpha band power are linked to cognitive performance, suggesting a potential area for further study. This study aimed to determine whether relative theta and alpha power and their ratio could predict gains in updating and inhibition training beyond the practice effects (the order of training session). Forty healthy middle-aged adults (aged 49-65) were randomly assigned to either the cognitive training group (<i>n</i> = 20), or the communication skills (control) group (<i>n</i> = 20). Both groups completed the self-administered training sessions twice a week for 10 weeks, totaling to 20 sessions. Resting-state EEG data were recorded before the first session. Mixed-effects model analyses revealed that higher relative parietal alpha power positively predicted training performance, while theta power negatively predicted performance. Additionally, higher parietal alpha/theta ratio was associated with better training outcomes, while the frontal alpha/theta ratio did not demonstrate significant predictive value. Other EEG measures did not show additional predictive power beyond what was accounted for by the session effects. The findings imply that individuals with specific EEG pattern may change with cognitive training, making resting-state EEG a useful tool in tailoring interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1530147
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parietal alpha and theta power predict cognitive training gains in middle-aged adults

Andrea Vranić, Luka Juras, Ivana Hromatko
2 citations
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
2.86
article

Parietal alpha and theta power predict cognitive training gains in middle-aged adults

Andrea Vranić, Luka Juras, Ivana Hromatko
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Research on executive functions training shows inconsistent outcomes, with factors like age, baseline cognitive abilities, and personality traits implicated as predictive of training gains, while limited attention has been given to neurophysiological markers. Theta and alpha band power are linked to cognitive performance, suggesting a potential area for further study. This study aimed to determine whether relative theta and alpha power and their ratio could predict gains in updating and inhibition training beyond the practice effects (the order of training session). Forty healthy middle-aged adults (aged 49-65) were randomly assigned to either the cognitive training group (<i>n</i> = 20), or the communication skills (control) group (<i>n</i> = 20). Both groups completed the self-administered training sessions twice a week for 10 weeks, totaling to 20 sessions. Resting-state EEG data were recorded before the first session. Mixed-effects model analyses revealed that higher relative parietal alpha power positively predicted training performance, while theta power negatively predicted performance. Additionally, higher parietal alpha/theta ratio was associated with better training outcomes, while the frontal alpha/theta ratio did not demonstrate significant predictive value. Other EEG measures did not show additional predictive power beyond what was accounted for by the session effects. The findings imply that individuals with specific EEG pattern may change with cognitive training, making resting-state EEG a useful tool in tailoring interventions.

Frontiers in Aging NeuroscienceVol. 17
University of Zagreb (HR)
Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.