Playing for progress: policy advocacy in sport for development

Sport for development (SFD) has emerged as a significant field of activity and has increasingly been critiqued for focusing on micro-level initiatives as a remedy to larger scale social or structural issues. This has led numerous scholars to propose more political meso or macro level approaches to deliver improved, sustainable outcomes. One such solution involves direct engagement in policy advocacy to support, and influence, policies that can directly benefit participants in SFD programmes. Against this background, our paper maps policy advocacy in the SFD field. Using results generated from a survey initiated in the context of a pan-European project, we map out the policy advocacy areas, activities and relationships within the sector. Our results show that most organisations engage in some form of advocacy, but much of this appears limited to the kind of self-interested advocacy that is designed to secure funding for organisational activities. Based on this, we argue that SFD actors should also engage in more progressive advocacy and suggest how research, as well as educational programming, can support this shift.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1546222
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Playing for progress: policy advocacy in sport for development

Albrecht W. Hofmann, Karen Petry, Ben Sanders, Louis Moustakas et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
8.40
article

Playing for progress: policy advocacy in sport for development

Albrecht W. Hofmann, Karen Petry, Ben Sanders, Louis Moustakas, Sarah Carney, Arnošt Svoboda, Alana Richardson, Sebastian Fischer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Sport for development (SFD) has emerged as a significant field of activity and has increasingly been critiqued for focusing on micro-level initiatives as a remedy to larger scale social or structural issues. This has led numerous scholars to propose more political meso or macro level approaches to deliver improved, sustainable outcomes. One such solution involves direct engagement in policy advocacy to support, and influence, policies that can directly benefit participants in SFD programmes. Against this background, our paper maps policy advocacy in the SFD field. Using results generated from a survey initiated in the context of a pan-European project, we map out the policy advocacy areas, activities and relationships within the sector. Our results show that most organisations engage in some form of advocacy, but much of this appears limited to the kind of self-interested advocacy that is designed to secure funding for organisational activities. Based on this, we argue that SFD actors should also engage in more progressive advocacy and suggest how research, as well as educational programming, can support this shift.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 7
German Sport University Cologne (DE), Munster Technological University (IE), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ), University of Applied Sciences Kufstein (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.