Destination Competitiveness Improvement: Insights From Causal Counterfactual AI Analysis

Previous methods for destination competitiveness improvement have mainly focused on identifying and prioritizing competitive disadvantages of destinations. Although effective, this approach may not be optimal as it may require more change than improving combinations of other competitive disadvantages. Furthermore, these methods neglect the differing foci of travel experiences between tourist groups and have been unable to identify targeted competitiveness improvement strategies for different tourist groups. This study addresses these research gaps by developing an analytical framework that can identify targeted strategies that entail minimal changes to improve the competitiveness of destinations for different tourist groups, based on user-generated data, aspect-level sentiment analysis, and the optimization-based causal counterfactual Al algorithm. The application of the framework is demonstrated through a case study involving four destinations in Australia. The proposed analytical framework and findings are valuable in assisting destinations to improve their competitiveness in today’s increasingly competitive experiential tourism market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Travel Research
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875251322512
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Destination Competitiveness Improvement: Insights From Causal Counterfactual AI Analysis

Haiyang Xia, Birgit Muskat, Marion Karl, Qian Li et al.
1 citations
Journal of Travel Research
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
4.20
article

Destination Competitiveness Improvement: Insights From Causal Counterfactual AI Analysis

Haiyang Xia, Birgit Muskat, Marion Karl, Qian Li, Gang Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Previous methods for destination competitiveness improvement have mainly focused on identifying and prioritizing competitive disadvantages of destinations. Although effective, this approach may not be optimal as it may require more change than improving combinations of other competitive disadvantages. Furthermore, these methods neglect the differing foci of travel experiences between tourist groups and have been unable to identify targeted competitiveness improvement strategies for different tourist groups. This study addresses these research gaps by developing an analytical framework that can identify targeted strategies that entail minimal changes to improve the competitiveness of destinations for different tourist groups, based on user-generated data, aspect-level sentiment analysis, and the optimization-based causal counterfactual Al algorithm. The application of the framework is demonstrated through a case study involving four destinations in Australia. The proposed analytical framework and findings are valuable in assisting destinations to improve their competitiveness in today’s increasingly competitive experiential tourism market.

Journal of Travel ResearchVol. 65(4)
Australian National University (AU), Deakin University (AU), Curtin University (AU), University of Surrey (GB)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Destination Competitiveness Improvement: Insights From Causal Counterfactual AI Analysis — Haiyang Xia, Birgit Muskat, et al. · Journal of Travel Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS