Racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer screening recommendation in the United States in 2021

Background: There were well-known racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the United States (US). Aims: To study the rate of CRC screening recommendation for individuals not up-to-date on screening and whether there were racial/ethnic differences in recommendation. Data and Methods: All adults 50 to 75 years old in the 2021 National Health Interview Survey who were not up-to-date on CRC screening were included. The rate of CRC screening recommendation in the past 12 months was calculated for non-Hispanic Whites, Blacks/African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine racial/ethnic differences in CRC screening recommendation, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic variables (age, sex, immigrant, college education and insured). Results: Among the 3,363 individuals not up-to-date on CRC screening, the rate of CRC screening recommendation was low across all racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic Whites 21.6%, Blacks/African Americans 17.8%, Hispanics 12.4%, and Asians 11.2%). Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, CRC screening recommendation was significantly lower for Hispanics and Asians in multivariate logistic regression (Blacks/African Americans: odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.09; Hispanics: OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93; Asians: OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.86), with other predictors including older age and uninsured. Conclusions: The rate of CRC screening recommendation was low for individuals not up-to-date on screening, especially for Hispanics and Asians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46439/gastro.3.021
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer screening recommendation in the United States in 2021

Yize Richard Wang
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer screening recommendation in the United States in 2021

Yize Richard Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: There were well-known racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the United States (US). Aims: To study the rate of CRC screening recommendation for individuals not up-to-date on screening and whether there were racial/ethnic differences in recommendation. Data and Methods: All adults 50 to 75 years old in the 2021 National Health Interview Survey who were not up-to-date on CRC screening were included. The rate of CRC screening recommendation in the past 12 months was calculated for non-Hispanic Whites, Blacks/African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine racial/ethnic differences in CRC screening recommendation, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic variables (age, sex, immigrant, college education and insured). Results: Among the 3,363 individuals not up-to-date on CRC screening, the rate of CRC screening recommendation was low across all racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic Whites 21.6%, Blacks/African Americans 17.8%, Hispanics 12.4%, and Asians 11.2%). Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, CRC screening recommendation was significantly lower for Hispanics and Asians in multivariate logistic regression (Blacks/African Americans: odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.09; Hispanics: OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93; Asians: OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.86), with other predictors including older age and uninsured. Conclusions: The rate of CRC screening recommendation was low for individuals not up-to-date on screening, especially for Hispanics and Asians.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental GastroenterologyVol. 3(1)
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.