موافقات الشيخ الألباني لحكم السيوطي على أحاديث الجامع الصغير من حديث 401 - 410

This study addresses the discrepancy between the symbolic notations employed by al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Suyūṭī in his rulings on selected hadith and the interpretations subsequently provided by Shaykh al-Albānī. Specifically, it examines hadith numbers 401 to 410 found in al-Suyūṭī’s al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr fī Aḥādīth al-Bashīr al-Nadhīr, with the aim of identifying instances where al-Albānī’s assessments align with Al-Suyūṭī’s judgments. Methodologically, the research adopts an inductive approach to analyse the chosen hadith, followed by a comparative examination of their symbolic evaluations as presented in al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr and in al-Albānī’s two works, Ḍaʿīf al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr wa Ziyādatuhu and Ṣaḥīḥ al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr wa Ziyādatuhu. The findings reveal that al-Albānī’s rulings concur with al-Suyūṭī’s in eight of the ten examined hadith, diverging in only two instances. In light of these results, the study encourages scholarly institutions to undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of all remaining hadith in al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr, thereby advancing the precision and reliability of future evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v20i2.479
Primary Topic
Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

موافقات الشيخ الألباني لحكم السيوطي على أحاديث الجامع الصغير من حديث 401 - 410

Kabiru Goje, Forat Mustafa Almazloum
Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah
Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
article

موافقات الشيخ الألباني لحكم السيوطي على أحاديث الجامع الصغير من حديث 401 - 410

Kabiru Goje, Forat Mustafa Almazloum
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the discrepancy between the symbolic notations employed by al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Suyūṭī in his rulings on selected hadith and the interpretations subsequently provided by Shaykh al-Albānī. Specifically, it examines hadith numbers 401 to 410 found in al-Suyūṭī’s al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr fī Aḥādīth al-Bashīr al-Nadhīr, with the aim of identifying instances where al-Albānī’s assessments align with Al-Suyūṭī’s judgments. Methodologically, the research adopts an inductive approach to analyse the chosen hadith, followed by a comparative examination of their symbolic evaluations as presented in al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr and in al-Albānī’s two works, Ḍaʿīf al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr wa Ziyādatuhu and Ṣaḥīḥ al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr wa Ziyādatuhu. The findings reveal that al-Albānī’s rulings concur with al-Suyūṭī’s in eight of the ten examined hadith, diverging in only two instances. In light of these results, the study encourages scholarly institutions to undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of all remaining hadith in al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr, thereby advancing the precision and reliability of future evaluations.

Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-SunnahVol. 20(2)
University of Sharjah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.