The Power of the Commons

This article argues that rational self-interest is but one dimension of human behavior. In the context of ‘overshoot’—the excessive consumption of resources beyond the planet’s regenerative capacity—rational self-interest proves detrimental from an evolutionary perspective. This paper provides an alternative to the Tragedy of The Commons, which results from collective action problems when rational, self-interested consumers put their individual welfare over that of the group, and offers the relational consumer, one who balances individual and group interests. Highlighting how ethics play a pivotal role in consumer behavior, we discuss human behavior, resource management, and collective action, then examine these theoretical frameworks in two case studies based in southern Africa. First is a biotic example of The Commons paired with the uMhlathuze Water Stewardship Partnership; second is an abiotic example of The Commons paired with Rotating Savings and Credit Association. These case studies exemplify not only that coordination is the best outcome, but also that institutions promoting self-interested behavior can undermine both collective and individual well-being. Considering intercultural ethics can augment consumer theory, especially in terms of sustainable long-term development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062512
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Power of the Commons

Joshua Farley, Lizah Makombore, Julia Danielsen
3 citations
Sustainability
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
3.32
article

The Power of the Commons

Joshua Farley, Lizah Makombore, Julia Danielsen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article argues that rational self-interest is but one dimension of human behavior. In the context of ‘overshoot’—the excessive consumption of resources beyond the planet’s regenerative capacity—rational self-interest proves detrimental from an evolutionary perspective. This paper provides an alternative to the Tragedy of The Commons, which results from collective action problems when rational, self-interested consumers put their individual welfare over that of the group, and offers the relational consumer, one who balances individual and group interests. Highlighting how ethics play a pivotal role in consumer behavior, we discuss human behavior, resource management, and collective action, then examine these theoretical frameworks in two case studies based in southern Africa. First is a biotic example of The Commons paired with the uMhlathuze Water Stewardship Partnership; second is an abiotic example of The Commons paired with Rotating Savings and Credit Association. These case studies exemplify not only that coordination is the best outcome, but also that institutions promoting self-interested behavior can undermine both collective and individual well-being. Considering intercultural ethics can augment consumer theory, especially in terms of sustainable long-term development.

SustainabilityVol. 17(6)
University of Vermont (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.