Decoding uncertainty for clinical decision-making

In this opinion piece, we examine the pivotal role that uncertainty quantification (UQ) plays in informing clinical decision-making processes. We explore challenges associated with healthcare data and the potential barriers to the widespread adoption of UQ methodologies. In doing so, we highlight how these techniques can improve the precision and reliability of medical evaluations. We delve into the crucial role of understanding and managing the uncertainties present in clinical data (such as measurement error), diagnostic tools and treatment outcomes. We discuss how such uncertainties can impact decision-making in healthcare and emphasize the importance of systematically analysing them. Our goal is to demonstrate how effectively addressing and decoding uncertainties can significantly enhance the accuracy and robustness of clinical decisions, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and more informed healthcare practices.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 1)'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0207
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding uncertainty for clinical decision-making

Krasimira T. Tsaneva-Atanasova, Marianna Laviola, Giulia Pederzanil
7 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
21.92
article

Decoding uncertainty for clinical decision-making

Krasimira T. Tsaneva-Atanasova, Marianna Laviola, Giulia Pederzanil
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In this opinion piece, we examine the pivotal role that uncertainty quantification (UQ) plays in informing clinical decision-making processes. We explore challenges associated with healthcare data and the potential barriers to the widespread adoption of UQ methodologies. In doing so, we highlight how these techniques can improve the precision and reliability of medical evaluations. We delve into the crucial role of understanding and managing the uncertainties present in clinical data (such as measurement error), diagnostic tools and treatment outcomes. We discuss how such uncertainties can impact decision-making in healthcare and emphasize the importance of systematically analysing them. Our goal is to demonstrate how effectively addressing and decoding uncertainties can significantly enhance the accuracy and robustness of clinical decisions, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and more informed healthcare practices.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 1)'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 383(2292)
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Living Systems (United States) (US), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
21.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.