Explaining trunk strength variation and improvement following resistance training in people with chronic low back pain: clinical and performance-based outcomes analysis

A multitude of variables contribute to the variation of trunk strength in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study investigated a range of variables to determine which variables contribute most to variation in trunk isometric strength and gains in strength following resistance training in people with CLBP. Outcome measures were recorded from 20 participants with CLBP both at baseline and following resistance training. Regression analyses were applied with the average trunk maximum voluntary isometric torque as the dependent variable. Variance in baseline trunk flexion strength (R<sup>2</sup> = .66) was explained by demographic covariates and a measure of trunk muscle co-activation. The baseline trunk extension strength variance (R<sup>2</sup> = .65) was explained by demographic covariates and lumbar erector spinae (LES) activity during a maximum trunk extension contraction. Demographic variables, trunk muscle co-activation, baseline trunk flexion strength, level of physical function, and pain intensity over the past week influenced the change in trunk flexion strength after training (R<sup>2</sup> = .93). Demographic variables and LES muscle activity explained the variance in trunk extension strength at follow-up (R<sup>2</sup> = .64). This study supports the major influence of sex, physical function and baseline strength and muscle activity, on the variation in maximum trunk strength in participants with CLBP at baseline and gains in trunk muscle strength following progressive resistance training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93280-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining trunk strength variation and improvement following resistance training in people with chronic low back pain: clinical and performance-based outcomes analysis

Janet A. Deane, David Jiménez‐Grande, Deborah Falla, Shouq Althobaiti
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
article

Explaining trunk strength variation and improvement following resistance training in people with chronic low back pain: clinical and performance-based outcomes analysis

Janet A. Deane, David Jiménez‐Grande, Deborah Falla, Shouq Althobaiti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A multitude of variables contribute to the variation of trunk strength in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study investigated a range of variables to determine which variables contribute most to variation in trunk isometric strength and gains in strength following resistance training in people with CLBP. Outcome measures were recorded from 20 participants with CLBP both at baseline and following resistance training. Regression analyses were applied with the average trunk maximum voluntary isometric torque as the dependent variable. Variance in baseline trunk flexion strength (R<sup>2</sup> = .66) was explained by demographic covariates and a measure of trunk muscle co-activation. The baseline trunk extension strength variance (R<sup>2</sup> = .65) was explained by demographic covariates and lumbar erector spinae (LES) activity during a maximum trunk extension contraction. Demographic variables, trunk muscle co-activation, baseline trunk flexion strength, level of physical function, and pain intensity over the past week influenced the change in trunk flexion strength after training (R<sup>2</sup> = .93). Demographic variables and LES muscle activity explained the variance in trunk extension strength at follow-up (R<sup>2</sup> = .64). This study supports the major influence of sex, physical function and baseline strength and muscle activity, on the variation in maximum trunk strength in participants with CLBP at baseline and gains in trunk muscle strength following progressive resistance training.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Taif University (SA), University of Birmingham (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.