Unveiling Untapped Potential: Leveraging Accident Narratives for Enhanced Construction Safety Management

Every construction accident generates a comprehensive accident report, as mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). These reports are essential sources of data for understanding construction accidents. Accident narratives are particularly valuable because they provide descriptive insights into the circumstances, human actions, and environmental factors. However, despite their importance, narrative data has been underutilized. No research has yet established how and why such narratives hold critical insights into accidents beyond what is offered by other data. In response, this research aims to quantitively demonstrate insights exclusive to the construction accident narratives within construction accident reports by exploring OSHA construction accident reports, analyzing both descriptive and nondescriptive portions. We take a mixed-method approach that combines qualitative content analysis of narratives with quantitative comparative analysis, individually and collectively. Our four-step validation process involves: (1) systematic coding to interact with the OSHA accident record archive to scrap and extract construction accident data and (2) human-led multistage content analysis to identify risk attributes, (3) statistical analysis comparing results between narrative and tabular data, and (4) quantitative assessment of exclusive information in narratives. Our work is validated with 400 full OSHA accidents. From these, we derived 2,443 risk attributes from narratives (3.45 times more), while identifying only 708 risk attributes from quantitative data. Additionally, 91.6% of the narratives yield exclusive risk attributes, not found in tabular data sets. Our findings provide compelling evidence that accident narrative data yields significantly richer and more nuanced insights than traditional tabular data. This depth enables a more comprehensive understanding of the intricate factors behind construction accidents, including root causes and contextual contributors. Consequently, this study underscores the importance of incorporating narrative data in future construction safety research, advancing safety practices, policymaking, and prevention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management in Engineering
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-6397
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling Untapped Potential: Leveraging Accident Narratives for Enhanced Construction Safety Management

Cristian Arteaga, JeeWoong Park, Inhwa Oh, U. Ray
2 citations
Journal of Management in Engineering
Occupational Health and Safety Research
3.08
article

Unveiling Untapped Potential: Leveraging Accident Narratives for Enhanced Construction Safety Management

Cristian Arteaga, JeeWoong Park, Inhwa Oh, U. Ray
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Every construction accident generates a comprehensive accident report, as mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). These reports are essential sources of data for understanding construction accidents. Accident narratives are particularly valuable because they provide descriptive insights into the circumstances, human actions, and environmental factors. However, despite their importance, narrative data has been underutilized. No research has yet established how and why such narratives hold critical insights into accidents beyond what is offered by other data. In response, this research aims to quantitively demonstrate insights exclusive to the construction accident narratives within construction accident reports by exploring OSHA construction accident reports, analyzing both descriptive and nondescriptive portions. We take a mixed-method approach that combines qualitative content analysis of narratives with quantitative comparative analysis, individually and collectively. Our four-step validation process involves: (1) systematic coding to interact with the OSHA accident record archive to scrap and extract construction accident data and (2) human-led multistage content analysis to identify risk attributes, (3) statistical analysis comparing results between narrative and tabular data, and (4) quantitative assessment of exclusive information in narratives. Our work is validated with 400 full OSHA accidents. From these, we derived 2,443 risk attributes from narratives (3.45 times more), while identifying only 708 risk attributes from quantitative data. Additionally, 91.6% of the narratives yield exclusive risk attributes, not found in tabular data sets. Our findings provide compelling evidence that accident narrative data yields significantly richer and more nuanced insights than traditional tabular data. This depth enables a more comprehensive understanding of the intricate factors behind construction accidents, including root causes and contextual contributors. Consequently, this study underscores the importance of incorporating narrative data in future construction safety research, advancing safety practices, policymaking, and prevention strategies.

Journal of Management in EngineeringVol. 41(3)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Seoul National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
3.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.