Risks Without Rights? The EU AI Act’s Approach to AI in Law and Rule-Making

Abstract The EU AI Act seeks to balance the need for societal protection against the potential risks of AI systems, with the goal of fostering innovation. However, the Act’s ex-ante risk-based approach might lead to regulatory obsolescence (already materialised in 2021 with the spread of LLMs and the consequent reopening of the regulatory process), as well as to over or under-inclusion of AI applications in risks’ categories. The paper deals with the latter outcome by exploring how AI uses in law and rulemaking hide risks not covered by the EU AI Act. It is then analysed as to how the Act lacks flexibility on amending its provisions, and the way forward. The latter is tackled without utopian and not really feasible proposals for a new act and risk-based approach, but focusing on codes of conduct and national interventions on AI uses by public authorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.13
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risks Without Rights? The EU AI Act’s Approach to AI in Law and Rule-Making

Nicoletta Rangone, Luca Megale
2 citations
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
4.96
article

Risks Without Rights? The EU AI Act’s Approach to AI in Law and Rule-Making

Nicoletta Rangone, Luca Megale
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The EU AI Act seeks to balance the need for societal protection against the potential risks of AI systems, with the goal of fostering innovation. However, the Act’s ex-ante risk-based approach might lead to regulatory obsolescence (already materialised in 2021 with the spread of LLMs and the consequent reopening of the regulatory process), as well as to over or under-inclusion of AI applications in risks’ categories. The paper deals with the latter outcome by exploring how AI uses in law and rulemaking hide risks not covered by the EU AI Act. It is then analysed as to how the Act lacks flexibility on amending its provisions, and the way forward. The latter is tackled without utopian and not really feasible proposals for a new act and risk-based approach, but focusing on codes of conduct and national interventions on AI uses by public authorities.

European Journal of Risk RegulationVol. 16(3)
Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.