Acute mental stress-induced alpha or beta-adrenergic reactivity patterns linked to unique cardiometabolic risk profiles

Cardiometabolic risk may differ based on a stress-induced alpha(α)-adrenergic response versus a predominant beta(β)-adrenergic response. Whether these responses might serve as significant markers of distinct cardiometabolic risk profiles based on hemodynamic reactivity remain unknown. We (1) characterized predominant α-and β-adrenergic hemodynamic response patterns to acute mental stress; and (2) determined the cardiometabolic risk profile within predominant α-or β-adrenergic responders, irrespective of age, sex, or ethnicity. We included 117 South African teachers (aged 20-65 years) and administered an acute mental stress task (Color-Word-Conflict test) for one-minute. Participants' hemodynamic response profiles were characterized as predominant α-adrenergic (decreases in cardiac output (CO) and Windkessel arterial compliance (C<sub>wk</sub>) (lowest quartile)) (n = 48) and β-adrenergic (increases in CO, C<sub>wk</sub> (highest quartile)) responses (n = 69) via Finometer beat-to-beat hemodynamic monitoring. Ambulatory-BP was measured and the number of 24 H-ischemic events determined by ECG. Cardiometabolic markers were analyzed using fasting blood samples, and abnormal glucose tolerance (Abnl-GT), combining prediabetes and diabetes, was defined as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 5.7% and/or fasting glucose > 100 mg/dL and/or diabetes medication usage. Predominant α-adrenergic responders presented with an overall poorer cardiometabolic profile, with higher levels of HbA1c, insulin, greater insulin resistance and higher total cholesterol and lower HDL-cholesterol. Adjusted analyses indicated that a predominant α-adrenergic profile had higher odds of central obesity (P = 0.031), low HDL-cholesterol (P = 0.042), 24-H-hypertension (P < 0.001), cardiac stress (P = 0.025), ischemic events (P = 0.048) and medium-to-high 10-year stroke probability (P < 0.001), compared to β-adrenergic responders. In the β-adrenergic responders, higher odds for ischemic events, stroke probability and Abnl-GT were found (all P ≤ 0.022), compared to α-adrenergic responders. Independent of age, sex or ethnicity, the risk profile identified in predominant α-adrenergic responders mainly involved the effects of a high-pressure system, cardiac stress, and ischemia. Whereas in predominant β-adrenergic responders, the risk profile pointed to a more metabolic and hyperperfusion injury-related cardiometabolic risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92961-2
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute mental stress-induced alpha or beta-adrenergic reactivity patterns linked to unique cardiometabolic risk profiles

Annemarie Wentzel, DuPreez Naude, Roland von Känel
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
5.55
article

Acute mental stress-induced alpha or beta-adrenergic reactivity patterns linked to unique cardiometabolic risk profiles

Annemarie Wentzel, DuPreez Naude, Roland von Känel
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Cardiometabolic risk may differ based on a stress-induced alpha(α)-adrenergic response versus a predominant beta(β)-adrenergic response. Whether these responses might serve as significant markers of distinct cardiometabolic risk profiles based on hemodynamic reactivity remain unknown. We (1) characterized predominant α-and β-adrenergic hemodynamic response patterns to acute mental stress; and (2) determined the cardiometabolic risk profile within predominant α-or β-adrenergic responders, irrespective of age, sex, or ethnicity. We included 117 South African teachers (aged 20-65 years) and administered an acute mental stress task (Color-Word-Conflict test) for one-minute. Participants' hemodynamic response profiles were characterized as predominant α-adrenergic (decreases in cardiac output (CO) and Windkessel arterial compliance (C<sub>wk</sub>) (lowest quartile)) (n = 48) and β-adrenergic (increases in CO, C<sub>wk</sub> (highest quartile)) responses (n = 69) via Finometer beat-to-beat hemodynamic monitoring. Ambulatory-BP was measured and the number of 24 H-ischemic events determined by ECG. Cardiometabolic markers were analyzed using fasting blood samples, and abnormal glucose tolerance (Abnl-GT), combining prediabetes and diabetes, was defined as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 5.7% and/or fasting glucose > 100 mg/dL and/or diabetes medication usage. Predominant α-adrenergic responders presented with an overall poorer cardiometabolic profile, with higher levels of HbA1c, insulin, greater insulin resistance and higher total cholesterol and lower HDL-cholesterol. Adjusted analyses indicated that a predominant α-adrenergic profile had higher odds of central obesity (P = 0.031), low HDL-cholesterol (P = 0.042), 24-H-hypertension (P < 0.001), cardiac stress (P = 0.025), ischemic events (P = 0.048) and medium-to-high 10-year stroke probability (P < 0.001), compared to β-adrenergic responders. In the β-adrenergic responders, higher odds for ischemic events, stroke probability and Abnl-GT were found (all P ≤ 0.022), compared to α-adrenergic responders. Independent of age, sex or ethnicity, the risk profile identified in predominant α-adrenergic responders mainly involved the effects of a high-pressure system, cardiac stress, and ischemia. Whereas in predominant β-adrenergic responders, the risk profile pointed to a more metabolic and hyperperfusion injury-related cardiometabolic risk.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
South African Medical Research Council (ZA), North-West University (ZA), University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
North-West University
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
5.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.