How Do Social Democrats Legitimize Cutbacks? Welfare Retrenchment to Save the Welfare State

Abstract Social democratic parties have contributed to the development of welfare state retrenchment in many European countries. While numerous studies have attempted to explain this, few have focused on how parties legitimize cuts, given that they are often unpopular with social democratic voters. Examining Sweden, we argue that the Swedish Social Democratic Party has developed a legitimation model that presents welfare cuts as a way of safeguarding the welfare state. This model has been persistently used since the early 1990s and is now central to the party's rhetoric. This has implications for how we should understand the ideological development of Swedish social democracy and suggests that it may be fruitful to study how welfare cuts are justified in other empirical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Government and Opposition
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2025.1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Social Democrats Legitimize Cutbacks? Welfare Retrenchment to Save the Welfare State

Niklas Altermark, Åsa Plesner
4 citations
Government and Opposition
Social Policy and Reform Studies
34.09
article

How Do Social Democrats Legitimize Cutbacks? Welfare Retrenchment to Save the Welfare State

Niklas Altermark, Åsa Plesner
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Social democratic parties have contributed to the development of welfare state retrenchment in many European countries. While numerous studies have attempted to explain this, few have focused on how parties legitimize cuts, given that they are often unpopular with social democratic voters. Examining Sweden, we argue that the Swedish Social Democratic Party has developed a legitimation model that presents welfare cuts as a way of safeguarding the welfare state. This model has been persistently used since the early 1990s and is now central to the party's rhetoric. This has implications for how we should understand the ideological development of Swedish social democracy and suggests that it may be fruitful to study how welfare cuts are justified in other empirical contexts.

Government and OppositionVol. 60(3)
Stockholm University (SE), Lund University (SE)
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Do Social Democrats Legitimize Cutbacks? Welfare Retrenchment to Save the Welfare State — Niklas Altermark, Åsa Plesner · Government and Opposition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS