Comparing Physiological Synchrony and User Copresent Experience in Virtual Reality: A Quantitative–Qualitative Gap

As technology-mediated social interaction in virtual environments prevails, recent Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) studies have suggested incorporating biosensory information cues that reveal users’ inner states to facilitate social information sharing and augment copresent experience. Physiological synchrony is believed to be engaged in several important processes of copresent experience. However, what impact different biosensory cues have on physiological synchrony and users’ copresent experience remains underinvestigated. This study selected a virtual reality (VR) electronic dance music setting and integrated five different biosignals, namely, power of electromyography (pEMG), galvanic skin response (GSR), heart rate (HR), respiration effort (RE), and oxyhemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A non-randomized controlled experiment with 67 valid participants and five baseline data providers revealed that GSR enhanced physiological synchrony significantly. However, semi-structure interviews with 10 participants indicated that RE and HR provided the strongest user-perceived copresence, which implies an intriguing gap between quantitative and qualitative analysis results. Five design implications were further generated and discussed in details for the future design and development of virtual copresent experience based on biosensory information cues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14061129
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Physiological Synchrony and User Copresent Experience in Virtual Reality: A Quantitative–Qualitative Gap

Ruowei Xiao, Ye Lei, Hong Yan, Yimin Wang et al.
2 citations
Electronics
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
3.87
article

Comparing Physiological Synchrony and User Copresent Experience in Virtual Reality: A Quantitative–Qualitative Gap

Ruowei Xiao, Ye Lei, Hong Yan, Yimin Wang, Ming C. Wu, Xuewen Wang, Daojun Gong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As technology-mediated social interaction in virtual environments prevails, recent Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) studies have suggested incorporating biosensory information cues that reveal users’ inner states to facilitate social information sharing and augment copresent experience. Physiological synchrony is believed to be engaged in several important processes of copresent experience. However, what impact different biosensory cues have on physiological synchrony and users’ copresent experience remains underinvestigated. This study selected a virtual reality (VR) electronic dance music setting and integrated five different biosignals, namely, power of electromyography (pEMG), galvanic skin response (GSR), heart rate (HR), respiration effort (RE), and oxyhemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A non-randomized controlled experiment with 67 valid participants and five baseline data providers revealed that GSR enhanced physiological synchrony significantly. However, semi-structure interviews with 10 participants indicated that RE and HR provided the strongest user-perceived copresence, which implies an intriguing gap between quantitative and qualitative analysis results. Five design implications were further generated and discussed in details for the future design and development of virtual copresent experience based on biosensory information cues.

ElectronicsVol. 14(6)
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO), Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN), Communication University of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Southern University of Science and Technology, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.