Re-positioning the social mandate of social work

This paper traces growing polarizations in the public and political responses to major contemporary global crises. It recognizes in them a widening split, inherent in the process of modernity, between personal autonomy and dependency on social units. The one-sided ideological emphasis on autonomy and individuality promoted by neoliberalism caused a disengagement from social solidarity measures like public welfare designed to reconcile both interests. It thereby weakened democracy and a shared positive understanding of the term social. The restricting impact of polarizations and autocratisation of social work practice get illustrated, leading to the proposal that reflections on core social work competences in terms of its ability to engage with ambiguity can lead to an ‘agonistic’ understanding of social work practice. This approach promotes shared learning processes of practised democracy in the course of social work interventions and represents a re-positioning of the understanding of ‘social’ from an essentialised quality to an evolving, connecting process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Social Work Research
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857x.2025.2478838
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-positioning the social mandate of social work

Walter Lorenz
4 citations
Nordic Social Work Research
Social Work Education and Practice
14.63
article

Re-positioning the social mandate of social work

Walter Lorenz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper traces growing polarizations in the public and political responses to major contemporary global crises. It recognizes in them a widening split, inherent in the process of modernity, between personal autonomy and dependency on social units. The one-sided ideological emphasis on autonomy and individuality promoted by neoliberalism caused a disengagement from social solidarity measures like public welfare designed to reconcile both interests. It thereby weakened democracy and a shared positive understanding of the term social. The restricting impact of polarizations and autocratisation of social work practice get illustrated, leading to the proposal that reflections on core social work competences in terms of its ability to engage with ambiguity can lead to an ‘agonistic’ understanding of social work practice. This approach promotes shared learning processes of practised democracy in the course of social work interventions and represents a re-positioning of the understanding of ‘social’ from an essentialised quality to an evolving, connecting process.

Nordic Social Work ResearchVol. 16(1)
Charles University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Work Education and Practice
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.