Computational Framework for Assessing Mission Outcomes with Humans and Robots

Space exploration is progressing toward long-term missions that involve both human (HAs) and robotic agents (RAs) in operations in lunar space habitats, the Gateway space station, and the moon-to-Mars program. These missions require high-level intelligence and a sustained performance over extended periods. Analyzing agent performance solely at the task level is insufficient for such complex applications because the resources consumed by agents are coupled with the utility they provide under various conditions. Additionally, factors such as the availability of agents to respond to hazardous events, impacted by factors including human sleep cycles and robot charging times, must be considered. Understanding how resources, utility, and availability are interrelated is crucial for early-phase decision making, assessing logistics, and steering investments in promising directions. In this study, the rapid simulation capabilities of control-oriented dynamic computational modeling (CDCM) were used to explore the trade space involving an HA and an RA tasked with maintaining a smart space habitat. This approach was used to model two independent parallel scenarios as systems of systems that use stochastic methods to account for mission variabilities. A human scientist (HS) was included to quantify the mission’s research outcomes. The outcomes generated by the HS served as a metric to compare the performance of the agents along with the costs associated with engaging the HA and RA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j063846
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spaceflight effects on biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational Framework for Assessing Mission Outcomes with Humans and Robots

Shirley J. Dyke, Ilias Bilionis, Amir Behjat, Xiaoyu Liu et al.
3 citations
AIAA Journal
Spaceflight effects on biology
3.49
article

Computational Framework for Assessing Mission Outcomes with Humans and Robots

Shirley J. Dyke, Ilias Bilionis, Amir Behjat, Xiaoyu Liu, Dawn R. Whitaker, Julio Ramirez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Space exploration is progressing toward long-term missions that involve both human (HAs) and robotic agents (RAs) in operations in lunar space habitats, the Gateway space station, and the moon-to-Mars program. These missions require high-level intelligence and a sustained performance over extended periods. Analyzing agent performance solely at the task level is insufficient for such complex applications because the resources consumed by agents are coupled with the utility they provide under various conditions. Additionally, factors such as the availability of agents to respond to hazardous events, impacted by factors including human sleep cycles and robot charging times, must be considered. Understanding how resources, utility, and availability are interrelated is crucial for early-phase decision making, assessing logistics, and steering investments in promising directions. In this study, the rapid simulation capabilities of control-oriented dynamic computational modeling (CDCM) were used to explore the trade space involving an HA and an RA tasked with maintaining a smart space habitat. This approach was used to model two independent parallel scenarios as systems of systems that use stochastic methods to account for mission variabilities. A human scientist (HS) was included to quantify the mission’s research outcomes. The outcomes generated by the HS served as a metric to compare the performance of the agents along with the costs associated with engaging the HA and RA.

AIAA JournalVol. 63(4)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Spaceflight effects on biology
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.